Introduction
"The first to present his case seems right, till another comes forward and questions him." (Proverbs 18:17)
In this essay, I will provide evidence against the case of Jesus of Nazareth’s Messiahship, shining a true light on the dusk shroud of deception, to illuminate the shadows of untruth, in order to expose one of the greatest lies to have ever been told. This truth is hereby of the upmost importance. It is meant to exalt the enigma of the true Messiah and squelch out the false rumors of Jesus’ divinity.
The devil portrayed through the life Jesus of Nazareth, the Messiah’s brutal execution and uncanny resurrection, persuading great multitudes of the World’s people that the Christ has come and gone, already winning the battle against Satan, by dying on the cross as a sacrificial lamb, providing salvation through God’s forgiveness only to those who are fully enveloped in the demagogic religious dogma of Christianity, when the battle for our eternal salvation, has not been won and salvation has yet to be delivered unto the World.
As stated in the Messianic Gospel of Christ, the true Messiah is destined to be birthed in this age of Armageddon, in order to save the world and destroy the antichrist, the incarnate soul of the devil, forever defeating the spirit of Satan and saving the souls of God’s children for eternity. God and Satan are at war and this entire dimension of the Universe has been created by their two powers colliding. Everything that has manifest has been planned between the influences of God and Satan, towards Armageddon and the final battle now unfolding upon the Earth. The Earth was created amongst the stars to host the final battle and now in the midst of Armageddon our eternal fates are being decided. The Christ and the Antichrist are now upon the Earth in flesh and we stand now on the brink of the Apocalypse. Christ's life must be protected and the Antichrist must be destroyed to defeat Satan and if Christ is destroyed by sin in Armageddon, Satan will be victorious over all souls and none will have salvation.
The world has been rendered unprepared for Armageddon and the time when the true Christ, God’s only true Messianic prophet, would arrive in the end of days to win the final battle waged between God and Satan, forever defeating the devil and saving the souls of God’s children from eternal damnation. Humanity has been blindly destroying the world against the life of Christ and has created a hell upon Earth, the Messiah must conquer and champion, saving the World, in order to survive and insure eternal salvation. The devil’s powerful evil reigns on Earth, stronger than ever before and humanity is still infested with great demonic wickedness, serving against the will of God, towards the destruction of Christ. Therefore based upon the facts that evil still is powerfully destroying the world and the true Christ still unknown, the Messianic Destiny of Christ is yet unfulfilled and Satan is still working to damn the souls of God’s children to eternal pain and suffering.
For more information about the true Messiah please read the Messianic Gospel of Christ.
Topics of Discussion
Arguing that Jesus of Nazareth is not Christ, God, the way unto God the Father and salvation, nor even a true prophet anointed by God, a large part of this essay will be analyzing Jesus of Nazareth’s claims to divinity and Messiahship and serve as argument against it. I will clearly provide evidence that suggests Jesus of Nazareth was a fraud and a false prophet that was framed as Christ on the cross by Satan, to deceive the desperate and gullible masses into believing the Christ has come and gone in victory and the battle was already won against the devil and for our salvation, through his brutal death and miraculous resurrection, providing God’s merciful forgiveness, as a sacrificial lamb to only who believe in his creed.
History so often has been propaganda of the victor, the poetry of the glorified and the legends of the superstitious and realistically what truth contained in our historical accounts is very likely distorted deeply by untruth, rhetoric, bias, and legend, concealed by lies and often entirely unreliable. However I will be scrutinizing what historical resources and references are available today, as evidence against Jesus of Nazareth’s fable and will focus the majority of this essay on what is written in the bible, particularly the biographical biblical scriptures that reference of a historical Jesus, the gospels of Mathew, Mark, Luke and John, attempting to expose any distorted truths and their untruths, with understanding that they are imperfect and flawed documents, with or without any real historical evidence about Jesus of Nazareth’s human life, whether or not he existed in the first place and was not purely legend.
Granting the benefit of the doubt, I will hence forth consider Jesus of Nazareth as a real historical figure and will not attempt to discredit that he lived, but will discredit his divinity and the biographical gospels that portray legends about his existence. We do not know if Jesus existed and if he did, exactly who he was, what he did and what happened to him in his life an estimated 2000 years ago, if that was when the events of his life transpired, but we can know, beliefs about Jesus that have circulated throughout history and that are circulating today amongst the world’s people have been one of the greatest influences on humankind, the development of human civilization for the last two millennium, having an extremely profound impact upon our evolving world throughout history, in some circumstances for good, but in many other circumstances for evil.
I will scrutinize the teachings and acts of Jesus and his disciples, with the understanding that contained in what was written about Jesus, are elements of moral truth amidst blasphemous lies. I will scrutinize the bible in an attempt to paint a more truthfully accurate image of Jesus than what was believed throughout history and what is believed today by the masses, working to find the most accurate, honest truth we can determine from analyzing their scriptures and form a conclusion based upon reality. We will analyze what Jesus is quoted to have said, what his biographies say and also other references to him within the Christian bible and found in other ancient historical manuscripts, in order to clearly decipher from a true perspective what reality and truth can be extracted from the historical lies.
We will look at the consequences of Jesus’ life and judge his contribution to the world based upon what good and what evil transpired for or against his name. One must judge the work of a leader based upon the work of those who fallow and judging the consequences throughout history of the Christian influence, Christian views, what conflict has transpired between Christians, Heretics and non-Christians over Christianity, the evils that Christians have been guilty of committing and the acts of Jesus’ own disciples and early church, we can see that Jesus of Nazareth’s teachings, like the teachings of all religions for that matter, are proven inadequate for governing human society and the moral standards of human beings, in a way that would render them worthy to even be considered Holy Divine Order.
We will focus much of our critique against Christianity, based on what evil has transpired in consequence of its existence, ultimately proving Christianity falls entirely short of the Glory of God, failing as a system of governing, a system of moral standards and a system of beliefs. Though on the contrary I will not undermine what good Christianity has contributed to the world and will attempt to express from a true perspective, what benefit it has been to humanity, in contrast to its great failures.
The legend of Jesus is a double edged knife that has inspired our world more than any other legend to have ever existed, both for good and for evil and its purpose has been used throughout history by both God and Satan. What good that has come from the legend of Jesus consists of the moral standards and sound teachings that are embedded within the bible’s fables and scattered throughout the Christian doctrine. Parabolic lessons of life and teachings that inspire righteousness, do in fact exist within the gospels and what sound advice and instructions the gospels contain, which can be extracted from the superstition, have been God inspired and for God’s ultimate intentions of serving to Universally save. But the evil, superstitious and deceiving scriptures that twist reality and speak religious lies that baffle the world’s people, deceiving the masses, dividing human beings in conflict and persuading evil actions or inactions, are diabolical words of the devil and satanically inspired.
Therefore I ask, has thus far the good of Jesus of Nazareth’s story outweighed the evil? Has God overall profited from the gospels, fulfilling his intentions more than the devil? Did God or the devil originally inspire and unleash the creation of Christianity and within Christianity, what is inspired by God and what is inspired by Satan?
This essay will serve to weigh the consequences of the legend of Jesus of Nazareth and seek to determine if it has overall been a blessing to humanity or a curse, and let the account of Jesus of Nazareth’s consequences judge over all whether or not his life was overall good or evil for our world.
Breaking down Jesus
Jesus in Christianity
Jesus has been the most falsely glorified human being to have ever existed on Earth and his epic has been more wide spread than probably any story to have ever spread across the Planet. To most Christians Jesus is believed to be the Son of God, a powerful deity and a divine human being, who performed miraculous healings and awesome feats as a mortal on Earth and was actually God Himself incarnate on Earth in flesh as a human being, who came to die a brutal death as a sacrifice in account for all the sin of humanity, crucified by the Romans, at the will of the Pharisees, under the authority of the Roman Governor of Judea Pontius Pilate, in the reign of the Roman Emperor Tiberius Caesar Augustus, in Jerusalem, around the year 33 AD, during the Jewish Holiday of Passover, so that those who believe in him and have faith in the gospel will be granted God’s forgiveness, be saved and have eternal life in heaven, apart from all those who don’t believe who will be condemned to hell.
Almost all Christians believe Jesus was the one by which all would be judged based upon whether or not they accepted or rejected him and are convinced their faith in Jesus and commitment to Christianity is enough to be liberated from eternal suffering in hell, to dwell in the glory of heaven, in spite of their acts upon the Earth, while the rest of who don’t believe will be condemned to hell with the devil no matter how good they truly are.
Certain Christian sects have determined religious obligations that they consider a necessity to gain access to heaven, from baptism and communion to speaking in tongues, but there are many Christians who consider only one condition to be granted entrance into heaven, acceptance of Jesus into your heart as your personal Lord and savior, something that can be done in a few seconds saying a prayer once in your life. Some Christians believe that they are obligated to believe in the Trinity and believe that Jesus is coequal, coexistent and coeternal along side God the father and the holy spirit and see Jesus in an overly glorified position as that of a God, meanwhile others who do not believe in trinity like Jehovah’s Witnesses believe Jesus was not God, but instead the Son of God. Throughout history there were many wars between the Holy Roman Church and those who they considered Heretic Christians for not believing in the Trinity Doctrine.
Breaking down the sequence of Jesus of Nazareth’s life that is portrayed synoptically in the gospels of Mathew, Mark and Luke, we can basically progress through Jesus’ nativity, baptism, temptation, ministry, passion, death and then resurrection, the most significant events which outline the basis of Jesus’ legend.
Jesus was born in
Historical records tell us all of the Apostles and disciples also died horribly brutal deaths like Jesus, except John who escaped death after being boiled alive in oil by Roman persecutors of Christians, later writing revelations and dieing in Turkey of old age around AD 98-117 during the reign of Emperor Trajan.
We must ask the questions, how did Jesus and his very few apostles succeed in spreading their religion so far across the Earth? How did Christianity transform from a religion facing great persecution, resistance and oppression from both Jews and Gentiles, into one of the most powerful Empires to have existed in middle Ages and into one of the largest worldwide religions that exists today? What higher intelligence ordained the spread of Christianity, leading to its establishment in the world as a powerful influence on the world’s people? And what was its ultimate purpose on Earth, serving imperfectly as an extremely flawed system of beliefs?
Jesus in Islam
To Muslims Jesus was another one of God’s great prophets and a servant of Allah, who they believe is not God, nor even the Son of God, though they believe he is the Messiah and in the much less detailed and differing version of Jesus’ story in the Quran, was not crucified like in the Christian bible, but was saved from destruction, miraculously ascending to heaven, destined to return in the end of days to bring peace and to destroy the Antichrist (Dajjal).
The Islamic Jesus was born of a virgin and was a creation of God that was a man, a prophet and the promised Messiah who performed miracles, healing the sick and raising the dead through the divine power of Allah, finally ascending to heaven at the end of his stay here on Earth.
The sequence of events of Jesus’ legend contained within the Quran, compared to the bible, are inconsistent with what is said in the New Testament. The Quran mentions many events that are similar to what is mentioned in the Old Testament and the New Testament, concerning Prophets like Abraham, Moses, David and Jesus, but in no chronological order that is consistent with what is mentioned in Christianity, scattering references to these legendary Characters throughout its scriptures in rather a disorderly way, compared to the chronological sequence in the Christian bible.
Islamic Jesus is significantly different from the Christian Jesus and Muslims and Christians are very divided by their contradicting views of Jesus. For example, in Islam Jesus was created from dust like Adam (Koran: Sura 3:59), while in Christianity Jesus was eternal (John 8:58), Islamic Jesus was not the lamb of God who was slain or crucified and therefore not resurrected (Koran: Surah 4.157, al-Nisaa’ 4:157-158), while in Christianity Jesus was the lamb and a sacrifice who was brutally murdered on the crucifix arising 3 days later (John 1:29, John 11:25), Islamic Jesus is not the son of God (KORAN: Maryam 19:34-38, Maryam 19:88-93, Surah 4.171), but in Christianity Jesus was the son of God (John 1:14, John 3:16, Galatians 4:4)
Above are only a select few of the more significant differences between the Islamic and the Christian Jesus and are many other contradictions in Islam VS Christianity revolving around their different stories of Jesus, working to divide the two religions.
Jesus in Judaism
To most Jews, Jesus was a fraud; a false prophet and a rebel, no greater than a regular man who was crucified for blaspheme in the first Century A.D. In the early development of Christianity, there was much disagreement amongst Jews as to who Jesus was and much conflict arose between Orthodox Jews and a new radical form of Judaism, Christianity, as it emerged. Many Jews would persecute Christians and Paul one of Christianities greatest contributions himself was formally a persecutor of Christians named Saul, one of Christianities greatest enemies, who scriptures say, converted on rout to Damascus from Judaism to Christianity, because of a miraculous encounter with Jesus.
Like other Jews in his day, Jesus would have spoken and written the Aramaic language and the scriptures suggest that he was well learned in Judaism and the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament). Like other educated Jews in his day, he was faithful to the Laws of Moses, learned in Jewish scriptures and oral law and expectant of the coming of the Messianic Era (which he called the "
Some Jews believe that Jesus was a Jew named Yeshua who was born in
Though some believe there is no connection between the Talmudic Yeshua and the Jesus of Nazareth, others believe there is. The main inconsistency between the Talmudic and Christian story is that during the time that Jesus was killed, the Romans ruled and the Sanhedrin did not have the power to impose the death penalty. Thus, some Jews believe that today's popular Christian ideas about Jesus are based on a combining of the Talmudic story of Yeshua and the historian Josephus' writing about Jesus, which included his execution by the Romans.
Today most Jews discredit Jesus of Nazareth’s stories as lies and believe the Messiah is still to come for God’s chosen people in a designated time when certain conditions are met. The Jews have specific criteria they have determined the Messiah would meet, as stated bellow and believe Jesus failed those standards and did not fulfill the Messianic purpose.
Jewish definition of Messiah
The word “Messiah” is an English rendering of the Hebrew word “Mashiach”, which is translated into “Anointed”. Originally it referred to a person initiated into God’s service by being anointed with oil. (Having oil poured on his head. Cf. Exodus 29:7, I Kings 1:39, II Kings 9:3). There are many “Mashiachs” in the Bible. Since every King and High Priest was anointed with oil, each may be referred to as “an anointed one” (a Mashiach or a Messiah A.K.A Christ). For example it says in Jewish scriptures: “God forbid that I [David] should stretch out my hand against the Lord’s Messiah [Saul]...” I Samuel 26:11. (In the Christian bible Messiah is already rendered as “anointed one”) Cf. II Samuel 23:1, Isaiah 45:1, Psalms 20:6.
This Jewish definition of Messiah to a great extent is undermining what truly the Christ is, or what a Messiah is meant to be, because they are determining that any authoritative human Jew that is a king or a high priest is Messianic and God ordained, because they were anointed with oil. Being anointed with oil is ultimately a traditional honor that was given unto kings and high priests in ancient
Some of the conditions of the Jewish Messiah are stated bellow.
First of all, he must be Jewish - "...you may appoint a king over you, whom the Lord your God shall choose: one from among your brethren shall you set as king over you." (Deuteronomy 17:15)
He must be a member of the tribe of
He must be a direct male descendant of King David and King Solomon, his son - "And when your days (David) are fulfilled, and you shall sleep with your fathers, I will set up your seed after you, who shall issue from your bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for my name, and I will make firm the throne of his kingdom forever..." (2 Samuel 7:12 - 13)
He must gather the Jewish people from exile and return them to
He must rebuild the
He will rule at a time of world-wide peace - "...they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore." (Micah 4:3)
He will rule at a time when the Jewish people will observe God's commandments - "My servant David shall be king over them; and they shall all have one shepherd. They shall follow My ordinances and be careful to observe My statutes." (Ezekiel 37:24)
He will rule at a time when all people will come to acknowledge and serve one God - "And it shall come to pass that from one new moon to another and from one Sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before Me, says the Lord" (Isaiah 66:23)
All of these criteria are best stated in the book of Ezekiel Chapter 37 verses 24-28:
“And David my servant shall be king over them; and they shall all have one shepherd. They shall also follow My judgments and observe My statutes, and do them. And they shall dwell in the land that I have given to Yaakov my servant, in which your fathers have dwelt and they shall dwell there, they and their children, and their children's children forever; and my servant David shall be their prince forever. Moreover, I will make a covenant of peace with them, it shall be an everlasting covenant with them, which I will give them; and I will multiply them and I will set my sanctuary in the midst of them forevermore. And my tabernacle shall be with them: and I will be their God and they will be my people. Then the nations shall know that I am the Lord who sanctifies
Jews believe if an individual fails to fulfill even one of these conditions, then he cannot be "The Messiah." A careful analysis of these criteria shows us that to date; no one has fulfilled every condition. Jesus definitely did not fulfill all of these conditions and had very minute impact upon the Jews in his day and age, compared to another false Messiah, Simon Bar Kokhba who led an army of thousands upon thousands against the Romans from 130-136 CE before he was defeated and denounced of being the Messiah. The profound impact that Christianity has had upon the world was the consequence of Jesus’ life, the work of the early church and those who fallowed in his path, but Jesus himself led only 12 close disciples who abandoned him and had only 3 years of ministry before he was executed.
The Biographical Gospels of Jesus of
Jesus died crucified by the Roman authority at the will of his own people and left little more than rumors of his miraculous works and words behind. As time passes, as was with some of our greatest ancient historical figures, like King Ramesses II, one of the greatest Egyptian Pharaohs who lived around the 13th and 12th centuries BC, Alexander the Great, the Macedonian conqueror who conquered much of the known world around 350 BC and Emperor Caesar Augustus 63 B.C. - 14 C.E., the first Roman Emperor and one of the greatest contributions to Roman Civilization, historical fact is fused with mythological fiction and legend distorts the truth, turning mere mortals into false idols, worshiped like Gods. The historical accounts of Jesus are extremely exaggerated and commonly misinterpreted.
Very little is known about the historical figure Jesus of Nazareth, whether or not he existed or was pure legend conjured by Jews around the first century AD, and if he did truly exist, who really was he?, what did he really do?, and what really happened to him? Though no one today can truly know if he lived and if he did, who he was, what he had done or what was done unto him, Jesus of Nazareth’s legend are believed to be the truth by billions of people existing throughout history, who believe or have believed the scriptures of the New Testament or the Quran.
We will first analyze the authenticity of the biographical gospels of Jesus of Nazareth and criticize their obvious flaws, before we consider Jesus of Nazareth’s life and move on to scrutinize the different variations of Jesus of Nazareth’s biography that these different gospels portray and the flaws of the biblical Jesus himself. To scrutinize Jesus, we will use the greatest historical resources modern humanity has available that reference of him, the first four books of the New Testament, the biographical Gospels of Mathew, Mark, Luke and John. The biographical gospels offer some insight as to who Jesus could have been, what he could have done and what could have happened to him, if he was in the first place, an actual historical figure and not purely legend. Scrutinizing the scriptures, I will discredit Jesus of divinity and criticize Jesus based upon what the bible states, because the bible itself is the source of today’s beliefs in Jesus of Nazareth and is a great resource for disproving Christianity, because of its many flaws.
The New Testament Canon in brief.
The leaders of the early Christian movement wrote roughly over 50-80 Christian gospels, hundreds of epistles, and other writings. Conservative Christians generally accept as valid only the material that forms the official canon: (four gospels, 21 epistles, and the books of Acts and Revelation). They view this material, and only this material, as having been inspired by God and without mistakes. The other Christian writings not included in the canon are considered worthless, heretical, deceptive, and false.
The modern orthodox Christian Canon consists of 27 books, four gospels, 21 epistles, and the books of Acts and Revelation.
Definition of Canon:
• noun: a collection of books accepted as holy scripture especially the books of the Bible recognized by any Christian church as genuine and inspired
• noun: a complete list of saints that have been recognized by the Roman Catholic Church
• noun: a rule or especially body of rules or principles generally established as valid and fundamental in a field or art or philosophy
The Christian Canon has been disputed throughout history and still today raises controversy and debate over the legitimacy of the bible. The 27 books included in the Modern Orthodox Christian Canonical New Testament, were determined centuries after over 50-80 gospels, hundreds of epistles and other writings surfaced as God inspired scriptures and were acknowledged as legitimate by various disagreeing groups within the Christian movement. After great debate and conflict over the legitimacy of these writings and their consistency, early church authorities determined which writings would be accepted as God inspired and which writings would be rejected as false. Many wars between the Catholic authority in the middle ages and who they considered Heretic Christian sects were fought over the canon and disagreeing views about Christianity. There have been many different proposed canons throughout history and many disputes over the creation of an official standard canon of Holy Scripture throughout history and still today there are many disputes within Christianity over the official Christian Canon, especially between the Protestant and Catholic sects.
During the fourth century, united attempts were made both in the East and the West to establish the authoritative collection of the Christian Canon. In 365 C.E., Athanasius of Alexandria compiled a list of twenty-seven books of the New Testament which he regarded as the "only source of salvation and of the authentic teaching of the religion of the Gospel" (Hannah, Notes, 2.6). Around that time Jerome in the West wrote a letter to Paulinus, bishop of Nola in 394 C.E., listing just 39 Old Testament books and our current 27 New Testament ones and the Synods of Carthage in 397 C.E. and 418 C.E. both confirmed our current twenty-seven books of the NT.
It took the early church roughly 3½ centuries for the Christian Canon to be finally determined, after years of debate and conflict and still throughout history conflicts over the Christian Canon arose and exist today in a divided Christianity. Many different Canons were issued and proposed throughout the first few centuries, but the Canon we have today was formed around the turn of the 4th century.
Why, if these authors of the early church were really truly God inspired, were they in such a great dispute over the truth? Why was the Canon so poorly organized throughout great drawn out conflicts and not peacefully and quickly determined by God Himself? Why was so much writing that the early Church dubbed as false mixed in with what they considered truth? If they divided all of the true scriptures from amongst the lies, how did they without mistakes? And why were the early Christian church’s writings not unanimously organized when they were first written, if God’s inspiration was governing its creation and protecting its correctness?
These are some of a few reasonable questions that cast reasonable doubt on the beliefs that the Christian canon and the collection of books it contains are in fact God’s pure words, for it was created impurely by manhandling mortals amidst great conflict about what is true and what is false. If the Christian canon was God’s true and official gospel, it wouldn’t have been for the church, such an extreme Challenge to determine and arrange, but by God’s grace would have been compiled with much more peace and harmony, correctly. The extreme conflicts that arose over disagreements within Christianity throughout history are consequence of that religion’s manhandled flaws and the devil’s influence within their religious dogma, existing against the will of God.
Not contained in today’s official canonical Christian doctrine is what is known as the Apocrypha. The term "apocrypha" was coined by the fifth-century biblical scholar
Several works ranging from the fourth century B.C.E. to New Testament times are considered apocryphal--including Judith, the Wisdom of Solomon, Tobit, Sirach (or Ecclesiasticus), Baruch, First and Second Maccabees, the two Books of Esdras, various additions to the Book of Esther (10:4-10), the Book of Daniel (3:24-90;13;14), and the Prayer of Manasseh.
The apocrypha have been variously included and omitted from bibles over the course of the centuries. Protestant churches generally exclude the apocrypha (though the King James Version of 1611 AD included them). The Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches include all of the apocrypha (except for the books of Esdras and the Prayer of Manasseh), and refer to them as "deuterocanonical" books, Greek for “a second canon”. To many Christians, the term "apocrypha" generally refers to writings entirely outside of the biblical canon and not considered inspired by God (such as the Gospel of Thomas).
No original copies of the original Christian writings exist today, they were lost throughout history and we must rely upon hand-written copies which are an unknown number of replications of the originals, with an unknown amount of errors and differentiations from the originals. The oldest known surviving part of a gospel dates from about 125 AD and consists of a few passages from an unknown gospel. Another ancient manuscript, a portion of the Gospel of John, is also dated to about 125 AD. Remaining gospel manuscripts date to the third century AD or later.
Generations upon generations have passed down what biblical documents are considered Holy Scriptures today. Our generation never received their religious scriptures directly from God, but from another generation who received their scriptures also from the generation before them. As these scriptures are spread, they are distorted from the original source. So even if they were in fact originated from God, they become more and more tainted by the human influence, manhandling them, each time a new translation is born. When people consider the bible the word of God, they are considering documents that were manhandled, not by divine mortal deities, but primitive human beings and many conflicting influences, to be God’s immaculate truth. The true Gospel is meant to be delivered directly by God’s anointed one himself and not have been manhandled by dozens upon dozens of authors and early church influences who had consequences upon what the modern New Testament contains. The decisions of the early church defined Christianity and all of the original documents that were under consideration of being God inspired and God breathed were sorted from what was considered to the early church obviously fraudulence, by conflicting human minds after great debate and throughout great controversy and disagreement over which scriptures are God inspired and which scriptures could be dismissed as false. The ultimate truth is they did not know the truth.
The Gospels
Gospel is translated from the Greek word "euangelion" which means "good news." Roughly 50-80 gospels were written in the first and second century and each was believed to have been accurate by various groups within the early Christian movement. Only four of the 50-80 gospels, the gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke and John were accepted by the early Christian movement as God inspired accounts of Jesus’ mortal life. They were only approved officially for inclusion in the official canon during the 4th century AD and today are positioned first in nearly every Christian bible’s New Testament.
The first 4 of the New Testament’s 27 books are the gospels which contain biographical materials of Jesus’ mortal life on Earth. Historically the first 4 gospels of the New Testament are believed by most historians to have been first written over at least 20-50 years after Jesus had already died around 30 AD and overall, though there are theories as to who wrote the gospels, they are all unanimous and none of them state of an author who wrote them. The early church determined early on in Christian history, the people who are credited as the gospels’ authors and the names Mathew, Mark, Luke and John title the first 4 books of the New Testament and are largely believed to be the names of the authors, though with much skepticism and debate over truly who wrote the gospels. Overall we cannot prove who wrote any of the four gospels or if what historical references that are contained within them, are at all historically accurate at any point in their writing, but none the less of whether or not real solid evidence exists within the biographical doctrine, these scriptures are considered the word of God and by many are considered 100% accurate truth and are essential doctrine of the modern orthodox Christian faith.
It’s a fact that the authors of the biographical gospels contained in the New Testament may not have themselves been eye witnesses of Jesus’ mortal life. Generally historians believe that the gospel of Matthew was written by Matthew the tax collector and the author who wrote the gospel of John, was the disciple in the gospel of John referred to as “the disciple whom Jesus loved”. But most educated scholars believe that neither Mark nor Luke were eyewitnesses to Jesus’ mortal life and that they wrote their gospels as second hand witnesses…
Why were 2 of the 4 gospels written by authors who never even knew Jesus of Nazareth? Why were there only 4 gospels? Why were there not 12 gospels, for each of the 12 disciples and their extensive eye witnesses (11 Gospels if do not include Judas)? And why wasn’t a doctrine established in Jesus of Nazareth’s life time, by Jesus himself, or by his 12 disciples while Jesus was alive and teaching, in good health?
With careful honest consideration, gazing upon the Christian canon with scrutiny and without stubborn bias, one finds that these gospels describing Jesus and the early church are unworthy and not the word of God or holy scripture, but the words of primitive human beings, in a primitive society, with primitive understanding of life and God and many misconceptions about reality in the Universe. The descriptions offered in the 4 gospels about Jesus and their different arrangement of the events of his life are extremely flawed, poor in quality, shallow and brief, contradictory, generalized, fictitious and obviously censored dishonestly by authors who chose to include and omit different portions and points at will, which differentiate one gospel from the next and by the early church leaders who determined which books would be officially allowed in the New Testament canon and which books were to be excluded. With an honest consideration of their flaws, one can see these gospels are clearly legends that are deceitful and filled with many shallow teachings that could only ever skim the surface of truth and many lies that are deeply rooted into the depths of deception. The disorderly and complicated manner of their creation and organization, render the gospels extremely manhandled and spoiled by the devil’s influence within the vulnerable human mind.
Synoptic Gospels
The first 3 gospels Mathew, Mark and Luke, are called the Synoptic Gospels because of what agreements they contain, while separately the gospel of John is not of the three Synoptic Gospels because it is very different in claims. It contains multiple contrary points and is the most unique of the first four books of the New Testament.
There are many theories that attempt to explain why the three synoptic gospels contain so many similarities, some of which propose, for example; that the rumors of the times and legends about Jesus may have been so typical and widespread, the three writers simply documented and wrote down the oral tradition of already common beliefs about Jesus that were being orally passed around that time; that the gospels were all written together, dependent on each other’s examples for reference and support; that they all drew from the same source of an original ancient gospel, or some other reference available they all used as their source describing Jesus that is now lost; that one or more of the gospels may have contributed to the writing of one or more others; or that they were all independently authored accounts, written completely separate from one another, legitimately stating documented testimonies of eye witnesses’ of Jesus’ life.
From the justified skeptical stand point, firmly considering that Jesus of Nazareth was not and is not Christ and had no miraculous gifts and performed no miraculous signs and wonders to suggest he was divine, we can eliminate the idea that these three gospels are true witnesses that aligned in agreement of factual miraculous events in Jesus of Nazareth’s life and can probably settle with the theory that either they were all conspired together, or most likely written from the same source, whether it be an original gospel that is now lost or the common folklore that was being orally spread at the time, regarding Jesus’ Messiahship. The synoptic gospels contain enough differences that would suggest they were written separately and enough similarities to suggest they were all derived from the same source and though the three synoptic gospels contain certain similarities, they also contain multiple chronological contradictions and variations in their different accounts of like events.
A quick comparison of the gospel accounts is enough to reveal how the Synoptic gospels follow each other as they describe alleged the life and teaching of Christ. The relationship between these accounts has been, on the one hand, an assurance to believers of the historical validity of the Gospels, but on the other hand, they have given rise to many questions about which Gospel was written first, whether subsequent authors borrowed from each other, and why there are differences in wording, style and order as the authors report the same events.
Basically the Gospels seem to portray a sequential account of Christ's life, progressing through his birth, baptism, temptation, ministry, passion, death and then resurrection. A closer comparison of the order of their accounts reveals several points at which they conflict in the sequence of events. Matthew places the healing of the centurion's servant before the disciples' controversial plucking of grain on the Sabbath and Jesus' healing of the man's withered hand. Luke, however, places the healing of the centurion's servant after these same events. Matthew places the clearing of the temple immediately following the triumphal entry, before the cursing of the fig tree. Mark places the clearing of the temple on the day after the triumphal entry and after the cursing of the fig tree. As a result of Chronological conflicts, Jesus is claimed to have raised Jairus' daughter twice from the dead, was twice crowned with thorns, was denied by Peter six or more times and so on.
The gospels also very strongly contradict with the gospel of John and it would seem that the author chose not to mention some significant points that were mentioned in the synoptic gospels of Mathew, Mark and Luke, and mentioned significant points that are not mentioned in synoptic gospels of Mathew, Mark and Luke. We could suggest based on the similarities of Mathew, Mark and Luke that they were derived together either from the same source or in communications with each other and John separately, explaining why it is so different and the other gospels are so much more similar.
Contrasts between John and the Synoptics
1)Material found only in the Fourth Gospel (John), not in the Synoptic Gospels (Matt, Mark, Luke)
• Prologue (1:1-18)
• "Signs," beginning with the Wedding at Cana (2:1-12)
• Dialogue with Nicodemus (2:23—3:21)
• Jesus and/or his Disciples Baptize People (3:22-26; 4:1-2)
• Samaritan Woman at the Well (4:1-42)
• Jesus Heals a Sick Man at the Pool of Bethesda (5:1-18)
• New Details at the Feeding of the 5000 (6:1b, 3-6, 8-9, 12b, 14-15)
• Bread of Life Discourse (6:22-65)
• Woman caught in Adultery (7:53—8:11)]
• Jesus Gives Sight to a Man Born Blind (9:1-41)
• Jesus Raises Lazarus from the Dead (11:1-44)
• Jesus Washes the Disciples’ Feet (13:1-20)
• "Disciple Whom Jesus Loved" (13:23-25; 19:26-27; 20:2-10; 21:7, 20-24; cf. 18:15-16?)
• Last Supper Discourses, incl. "Paraclete" & "Vine and Branches" (13:31—16:33)
• Great Prayer of Jesus (17:1-26)
• New Details at the Trial before Pilate (18:28—19:16)
• New Details at the Crucifixion (19:20-24, 26-28, 30-37, 39)
• First Resurrection Appearance to Mary Magdalene alone (20:11-18; cf. Matt 28:9)
• Resurrection Appearance to Thomas (20:24-29)
• Another Resurrection Appearance at the Sea of Tiberias/Galilee; Dialogue between Jesus & Peter (21:1-25; cf. Luke 5:1-11)
• First and Second Endings to the Gospel (20:30-31; 21:24-25)
2) Material familiar from the Synoptics but not found in John
• No Infancy Narrative (but see John 1:14 - "the Word became flesh")
• No Childhood Episodes (but see 1:12; 13:33; 21:5 - believers called "children")
• No Baptism of Jesus (but see 1:19-34 - John testifies about Jesus)
• No Temptation in the Desert (but see 8:44; 13:2, 27 - the role of Satan & the Devil)
• No Calls to Repentance (but see 1:29; 5:14; 9:41; 15:22; 20:23 - on sin and forgiveness)
• No Sermon on the Mount or Beatitudes (but see 13:17; 20:29 - Jesus calls believers blessed)
• No Lord's Prayer (but see 17:1-26 - the Great Prayer of Jesus)
• No List of "Twelve Apostles" (but see 13:16 - messengers; 1:35-51; 6:67-71; 20:24; 21:2 - disciples; "the Twelve")
• No Mission of the Disciples during Jesus' Lifetime (but see 13:20; 14:12; 20:21 - risen Jesus sends them out)
• No Parables (but see 10:6; 15:1-8; 16:25, 29 - a few "figures of speech")
• No "Kingdom of God" Teaching (except 3:3-5; cf. 1:49; 6:15; 12:13-15; 18:33-39 - Jesus' role as "King of Israel")
• No Ethical Teachings (except 13:34-35; 15:12, 17; cf. 14:21-24 - "Love One Another" and "Love Jesus/God")
• No Exorcisms (but see 7:20; 8:48-52; 10:19-21 - Jesus accused of having a "demon")
• No Transfiguration Story (but see 1:45; 3:14; 5:45-47; 9:28-29 - Jesus associated with Moses)
• No Passion Predictions (but see 5:18; 11:50-53 & 18:14; 12:24-25, 32-33; 18:31-32 - talk of Jesus' death)
• No Institution of Eucharist at the Last Supper (but see 6:22-59; 13:1-20 - Bread of Life discourse; Washing of Feet)
• No Predictions of Jesus' Return (except 14:3; 21:22-23 - Jesus will "come again" or "come")
• No Ascension Narrative (but see 3:13; 6:62; 20:17 - Jesus talks about descending and ascending)
3) Material Significantly different in John and the Synoptics
*1- Synoptic
*2- John
1-Jesus’ ministry only lasts about one year –
2-Jesus’ ministry spans three Passovers (John 2:13; 6:4; 11:55)
1-John the Baptist is “Elijah”; preaches repentance –
2-John [baptizer] is not Elijah, but a “witness” to Jesus (John 1:19-36)
1-Jesus’ ministry begins after John the Baptist’s arrest –
2-Jesus’ ministry overlaps with John’s (John 3:22-30)
1-First four disciples Jesus calls are two pairs of brothers: Simon & Andrew, James & John–
2-First five disciples: Andrew, an anonymous second one, Simon Peter, Philip, Nathanael (John 1:35-51)
1-Many “miracles” but few longer speeches –
2-Only a few “signs” but several long monologues and dialogues
1-Opponents of Jesus include Sadducees, Herodians, etc. --
2-Jesus’ opponents usually called “the Jews” or “the world”
1-Opponents plot to destroy/kill Jesus for various reasons—
2-Opponents try to stone Jesus for blasphemy (John 8:59; 10:31-33; cf. 11:8)
1-Only one journey to
2-Multiple visits to
1-Temple cleansing occurs one week before Jesus’ death—
2-Temple cleansing at the beginning of Jesus’ ministry (John 2:13-22)
1-Anointing at
2-Anointing at
(John 12:1-8)
1-Last Supper is the Passover Meal; Jesus is crucified on the Day of Passover—
2-Last Supper is before the Passover (John 13:1; 18:28); Jesus dies on the Preparation Day before Passover (John 19:14, 31, 42)
1-“Love your neighbors”; “Love your enemies”
2-“Love one another” (John 13:34-35; 15:12, 17; focus within cmnty)
1-Peter is first and most prominent of the “apostles” –
2-Mary Magdalene, Martha of Bethany, and the “Beloved Disciple” are more prominent as “disciples”
1-Future Eschatology: “
2-Realized Eschatology: “Eternal Life” now (John 3:36; 5:24; 6:47-54)
1-“
2-“Garden” in
1-Women prepare spices to anoint Jesus’ body after his burial—
2-Joseph of Arimathea & Nicodemus anoint his body before burial (John19:38-42)
Mathew
Mathew, who is considered by many to have written the gospel of Mathew, is also considered by many to be Mathew the tax collector, who was one of Jesus’ 12 disciples and allegedly an eye witness to the real historical Jesus of Nazareth. Modern critical studies suggest the author who wrote the gospel of Mathew had dependents on the gospel of Mark as a source. One then must ask why, if Mathew was an eye witness to Jesus would he have depended so heavily on Mark’s account? Who is Mathew if not the tax collector, if he used Mark, who wasn’t an eye witness, as a source of his writing and not his own eye witness?
There is much debate over when Mathew was written, believed by some to be written in the early church period, possibly in the early part of 50C.E., when the church was largely Jewish and the gospel was preached to Jews only (Ac 11:19) and believed by others who have concluded both Mathew and Luke used Mark as their source, that Mathew must have been written in a later period, after Mark’s gospel would have already been circulated, in the late 50’s, 60’s, 70’s or even later. However, there isn’t enough evidence to confirm either theory to be true. The Jewish nature of Mathew’s Gospel to some suggests that it was written in
The gospel of Matthew was written in Greek, so his readers were obviously Greek speaking, but many believe they were also Jewish, because of the strong concern in the Gospel of Matthew with Jesus’ fulfillment of prophecies in the Old Testament; his tracing the genealogy of Jesus from Abraham (Mathew 1:1-17); his lack of explanation of Jewish customs compared to the gospel of Mark (assuming his readers already were acquainted with Judaism); his emphasis on Jesus’ role as “Son of David” which was a Messianic trait. ( Matthew 1:1; 9:27; 12:23; 15:22; 20:30-31; 21:9,15; 22:41-45)
Matthew’s aims were to mainly persuade already Jewish readers that Jesus of Nazareth was the Christ and the Messiah. Matthew expresses Jesus’ life and ministry as a fulfillment of Old Testament scriptures and quotes the Old Testament multiple times in relation to Jesus’ life.
Mark
The gospel of Mark like many other content in the New Testament has no internal evidence of authorship, but based upon the testimony of the early church, it is determined that this gospel was written by John Mark (“John, also called Mark,” Ac 12:12,25; 15:37). The most significant evidence comes from the writings of Papias (A.D. 140), who quotes from an even earlier source as saying: Mark was a close associate of Peter, from whom he received a second hand witness of things done and said by Jesus.
John Mark is located in the New Testament. For example, Mark first mentioned in connection with his mother, Mary, who owned a house in
Those who believe the gospels of Mathew and Luke used the gospel of Mark as a major source have suggested that Mark may have been composed in the 50’s or early 60’s, and therefore both Matthew and Luke were written at later dates. Others believe based upon the content of Mark’s gospel and the statements made about the gospel of Mark by the early church fathers indicate that the book was written shortly before the destruction of
This gospel was most likely written for the church in
Mark is believed to have been used as a source for many other writing in the New Testament and used as source material by both Mathew and Luke in their gospels, as over 90% of its contents appear elsewhere in the New Testament. Only about 30 of its verses are not paralleled in Matthew or Luke. A mathematical comparison shows that 91% of Mark’s gospel is contained in Matthew, while 53% of Mark is found in Luke, though it’s recognized that Mark was not a disciple of Jesus.
Why would Mark have been used in writing of both Matthew and Luke, if Mark was not an eye witness to Jesus of Nazareth’s life? Mark was not himself an eyewitness and was only a second hand account, who was a close associate of Peter, one of the 12 apostles. If Mathew was Mathew the tax collector and himself was an eye witness, why would he have used Mark’s gospel? Clearly this is a cause for more doubt on the development of the gospels.
Luke
Again, the author of the gospel of Luke is unknown and not mentioned within the bible, but it is evident that Luke was its author. Luke’s gospel is a companion to the book of acts, and the similarities in linguistic and theological statements and cross-references between the Gospel of Luke and the Acts indicate that both works derive from the same author. Both the gospel of Luke and the book of Acts are directly addressed to the same individual, Theophilus and are clearly state in their opening chapters, Theophilus’ name as “most excellent Theophilus” (Lk 1:3; Acts 1:1). “most excellent” signifies Theophilus was a Roman official or at least of high position and wealth and may have been Luke’s publisher responsible for seeing that the writings were copied and distributed.
Most commonly people believe the Gospel of Luke was written A.D. 59-63, and the 70’s or 80’s, most likely in
The author of Luke and Acts is thought to have known Paul based upon the “we passages” (Acts 16:10-17; 20:5-15; 21:1-18; and 27:1-28:16). For example, Acts 16:10 NIV: reads, “After Paul had seen the vision, we got ready at once to leave for
There are disagreements between the narrative of Acts and the letters in the New Testament (mainly Galatians), but in many cases they are explained if the author of Luke and Acts didn't own any copies of Paul's letters to which he could reference. It is, after all, improbable that Paul would dispatch a letter both to a church and then to all his part-time companions.
Acts actually is dated for a date before 100 A.D., after which these letters were collected, published, and canonized. It is believed by some that the Gospel of Luke may have been written as early as A.D. 62 because Acts does not narrate the martyrdom of Paul. Some theories of why Luke did not mention the martyrdom of Paul was because Luke finished this volume before Paul's death, or that Luke died before he could finish this volume, or before he could undertake still a third volume.
Luke was probably a Gentile by birth, educated in Greek culture, a physician by profession, a companion of Paul at various times in between his second missionary journey and his final imprisonment in Rome, and a friend who remained with the apostle after others had deserted him (2Ti 4:10-11).
The Gospel of Luke’s author does not claim to have been an eyewitness of Jesus’ life, but to have investigated everything carefully and to have written an orderly narrative based on circulating testimonies (Luke 1:1-4). Though Luke states that many others had already written of Jesus’ life (Lk 1:1), Luke does not indicate that he relied solely on these reports for his own writing. He states he used personal investigation and arrangement, based upon “eyewitnesses and servants of the word” (Lk 1:2) including the preaching and oral accounts of the apostles. Luke’s language differentiates from the other Synoptic gospels and his unique content (eg. Lk 10:1-18:14; 19:1-28) suggest that his work was in ways independent, though he obviously used some of the same sources as the other synoptic books of the New Testament. The authors of the other three Gospels, Matthew, Mark, and John, probably used similar sources. According to the two-source hypothesis, the most commonly accepted solution to the synoptic question suggests Luke's sources included the Gospel of Mark and another collection of lost sayings known by scholars as Q, the Quelle or "source" document.
John
Most assuredly many people believe, the author of the gospel of John is the apostle John, “the disciple whom Jesus loved” (Jn 13:23; 19:26; 20:2; 21:7,20,24) and the gospel’s author obviously obtained extensive insight into Jewish life, mentioning Jewish Messianic perceptions (Jn 1:21), the conflict between Jews and Samaritans (Jn 4:9), and Jewish customs, such as circumcision. (Jn 7:22)
Most scholars agree the gospel of John was written somewhere between AD 65 and 85, though some scholars place the writing of the final edition of John later in the first or early second century. John is the most divergent of the four gospels and is clearly independent in many ways, but there are references to the statements of Clement of Alexandra (died between 211 and 216), that John wrote to supplement the account found in the other Gospels, the synoptic gospels, and therefore John was written later than the first 3. The dating is important since John is agreed to be the last of the canonical Gospels to have been written and thus marks the end date of their composition. Like the other gospels according to critical scholars, John was based on previous texts that are now lost.
The Gospel of John has multiple differences and contradictions in contrast to the gospels of Mathew, Mark and Luke, the three gospels known as Synoptic. To a large extent John is agreed to have been independently written apart from the other three Synoptic gospels because of its uniqueness compared to the similarities in the Synoptic gospels. John’s gospel highlights specific matters that are in less depth in the other gospels and mentions multiple events that are absolutely not contained in the synoptic gospels, at the same time, failing to mention or express in depth specific matters that are contained within the gospels of Mathew, Mark and Luke.
Jesus of
Jesus was originally known to the followers of the early Christian church, at most as a mortal prophet of God, a powerful healer, sage and a Messiah (anointed one), but today many modern Christians are under the impression that Jesus was in fact the divine incarnation of God. Though it is clear the bible has not clearly defined Jesus of Nazareth’s divinity as that of a God, today Christians have been persuaded that Jesus of Nazareth was not only the Christ, but God incarnate as Christ.
Immense populations were eradicated during the middle ages warring over the definitions of Jesus of Nazareth’s divinity and conflict over whether Jesus is God the Son and God’s equal, one with the Godhead, or the mortal Son of God and inferior to God, still is brewing amongst Christians today.
The belief that Jesus was the Son of God and coequal to the Most High God was established, during the First Council of Nicea which in 325 AD by vote determined that Jesus was in fact “The Son of God”, though not unanimously without argument and debate.
The Fist Council of Nicea (
By vote the council of Nicea affirmed the deity of Jesus of Nazareth and established an official definition of Trinity. It was determined that Jesus was united in one God head coequal, coexistent and coeternal to God the Father and God the Holy Spirit. The three elements of God the Son, God the Father and God the Holy Spirit in the eyes of the church were officially separate units of one united and Triadic God Head of Trinity.
Emperor Constantine, in a letter sent to the bishops, who were not in attendance at Nicea, required that they accept "this truly Divine injunction."
How did a mere mortal man seen by the early Christian church as a Messianic servant of God, a prophetic sage and a healer, become officially recognized as God Himself incarnate as the mortal Christ? What authority did these early church leaders have to determine such a radically extreme claim, that the man Jesus was God and why would the votes cast by a council of early church leaders, mean what they determine in their vote is officially God inspired? Why, if it was truth that Jesus was God, would it not have been defined by God Himself in Christianities earliest developments and not about 3 centuries later? Why do so many Christians believe, Jesus is God, if their faith is derived from the bible and the bible never fully mentions such a claim to a Most High Divinity? These questions and more should be asked before one settles in biased and presumptuous conclusion that Jesus of Nazareth is the Son of God or God the Son.
Jesus is quoted to have kept his identity largely in secret. Jesus is not quoted in the bible to have claimed to have been God, nor did he directly announce in public with boldness he was the Son of God for that matter, but rather in a few scriptures is quoted to have admitted under scrutiny he was the Son of God, though never actually bluntly saying aloud “I am the Son of God”. (Luke 22:66-70; Mark 14:61b-62)
Luke 22:66-70 [66] At daybreak the council of the elders of the people, both the chief priests and teachers of the law, met together, and Jesus was led before them. [67] "If you are the Christ,” they said, "tell us." Jesus answered, "If I tell you, you will not believe me, [68] and if I asked you, you would not answer. [69] But from now on, the Son of Man will be seated at the right hand of the mighty God." [70] They all asked, "Are you then the Son of God?" He replied, "You are right in saying I am."
Mark 14:61b-62 [61b] Again the high priest asked him, "Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?" [62] "I am," said Jesus. "And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven."
"Son of Man" was a Jewish term in the Old Testament referring to the expected Messiah and a more subtle way of proclaiming Messiahship (Dan 7:13-14). Though Jesus never may have admitted concisely divinity and Godliness, there are scriptures in the bible, in which Jesus is quoted to have claimed Messianic Majesty by calling himself the “Son of Man” which was technically a Messianic claim (Lk 22:66-70; Mk 14:61b-62; Dan 7:13-14) and again, he is, in a more indirect way, quoted to admit that he was the Son of God and the Christ when asked (Lk 22:66-70; Mk 14:61b-62. Jn 10:36).
(Daniel 7:13-14) [13] "In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. [14] He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all peoples, nations and men of every language worshiped him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion that will not pass away, and his kingdom is one that will never be destroyed.
The Son of Man mentioned in (Dan 7:13-14) is definitely, based upon its description, not as meager as it sounds referring only to human mortality and frail finiteness. It may suggest mortality, but its definition in the Old Testament expresses someone with an elite power and Godly anointing. It is actually described to be one who is powerful with God given authority, glory and sovereign power, who is worshiped by all Nations and peoples and who establishes an everlasting dominion and a kingdom that will never be destroyed. This doesn’t seem to be as mediocre as the title “Son of Man” sounds, for all men are sons of men and sons of God as well for that matter. By calling himself the “Son of Man”, Jesus is using a Jewish term that describes a Messianic warrior of God and is overall laying claim to that title, claiming to be Messiah with more demagogical rhetoric then fulfillment.
Like the many other ways Jesus is related in scriptures of the New Testament to scriptures of the Old Testament, these claims mentioning of “The Son of Man” that Jesus is quoted to have made, are in harmony with the Old Testament scriptures. Relating Jesus to the “Son of Man” is meant to suggest God’s anointing and Majesty are blessed upon the life of Jesus and is a claim of Messiahship (Dan 7:13-14). Especially the gospel of Matthew contains multiple references to the Old Testament, largely because the gospel of Mathew was written to covert Jews who were educated in Judaism, to believe Jesus was in fact the Messiah.
Another Messianic title given to Jesus in the New Testament that is in direct relation with what was already believed and established in the Old Testament was claiming to be “The Son of David”. What does it mean that Jesus is the son of David?
17 verses in the New Testament describe Jesus as the “son of David.” But how could Jesus be the son of David if David lived about 1000 years before Jesus of Nazareth was born? By claiming Jesus is the “son of David” the New Testament is claiming Jesus was the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophesy that the Messiah would be the seed of David (2 Samuel 7:14-16). Mathew 1 offers a genealogy portraying Jesus as a direct descendent of Abraham and David through Joseph, Jesus’ legal father, but if Jesus was born of a virgin, then Joseph was not his biological father and was only his guardian father in law and through Joseph, Jesus would never have been biologically linked to David through his father. The Jews question the lineage of Jesus and Jesus' right to the throne of David; although Christians believe it will not be fulfilled until the
Please note that the throne of David is officially a claim to Israeli sovereignty and not Universal Majesty over all of mankind.
If Jesus came at the end of days and sat upon the throne of David finally fulfilling the Old Testament prophecy to David’s lineage, would he only call himself again, “The King of the Jews” only choosing to reign honoring Israeli sovereignty? The throne of David was not a global throne, but a throne only over Israelites, and the average Israelite in the world, holds no allegiance to Jesus of Nazareth’s claim to majesty or divinity.
Another way of Jesus claiming superior status, superior to that even of Abraham, who was considered by Jews the father of all nations, was by saying…
(John 8:58 NIV) 58 "I tell you the truth," Jesus answered, "before Abraham was born, I am!”
Firstly one can recognize that this scripture is in improper tense. It is not possible to exist in the present of the past, standing in the true present boasting about being currently present in the past. If Jesus was born as a child and raised into adulthood, then was bound in time and not supernaturally defiant of the Universal Laws of Time. Therefore when he was in adulthood, he couldn’t say that “when I was an infant, I am”, because the truth is, when he was born an infant, he was. This is just more tricky rhetoric, he’s using in attempts to glorify himself to baffled primitive minds.
This again is another more subtle and tricky way of claiming to be God’s anointed or a higher being, without directly and bluntly boasting, “I am the Christ” or, “I am Godly”. But why again wouldn’t the Christ have been directly heralding the gospel that “the Messiah has come and it is I”, plain and clear, and not only claiming words that without actions and great consequence mean little or nothing, but proving with the power of God, which is the confirmation of the anointing of God and the truth of God’s word. Why does being the Messiah need to be kept so secret? The bible doesn’t answer this question.
As stated in (Luke 4:18-21) of the New Testament, Jesus claimed to be the anointed one, quoting Isaiah 61 from the Hebrew Bible, stating that he was the fulfiller of God's promises, Jews believe God first made to the early Israelites and was the one who would bring the year of the Lord's favor.
Isaiah 61 - The Year of the LORD's Favor
The Year of the LORD's Favor
1 The Spirit of the Sovereign LORD is on me,
because the LORD has anointed me
to preach good news to the poor.
He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted,
to proclaim freedom for the captives
and release from darkness for the prisoners, [a]
2 to proclaim the year of the LORD's favor
and the day of vengeance of our God,
to comfort all who mourn,
3 and provide for those who grieve in Zion—
to bestow on them a crown of beauty
instead of ashes,
the oil of gladness
instead of mourning,
and a garment of praise
instead of a spirit of despair.
They will be called oaks of righteousness,
a planting of the LORD
for the display of his splendor.
4 They will rebuild the ancient ruins
and restore the places long devastated;
they will renew the ruined cities
that have been devastated for generations.
5 Aliens will shepherd your flocks;
foreigners will work your fields and vineyards.
6 And you will be called priests of the LORD,
you will be named ministers of our God.
You will feed on the wealth of nations,
and in their riches you will boast.
7 Instead of their shame
my people will receive a double portion,
and instead of disgrace
they will rejoice in their inheritance;
and so they will inherit a double portion in their land,
and everlasting joy will be theirs.
8 "For I, the LORD, love justice;
I hate robbery and iniquity.
In my faithfulness I will reward them
and make an everlasting covenant with them.
9 Their descendants will be known among the nations
and their offspring among the peoples.
All who see them will acknowledge
that they are a people the LORD has blessed."
10 I delight greatly in the LORD;
my soul rejoices in my God.
For he has clothed me with garments of salvation
and arrayed me in a robe of righteousness,
as a bridegroom adorns his head like a priest,
and as a bride adorns herself with her jewels.
11 For as the soil makes the sprout come up
and a garden causes seeds to grow,
so the Sovereign LORD will make righteousness and praise
spring up before all nations.
In Luke 4:18-21 Jesus reads several verses from the book Isaiah chapter 61 from the Jewish scriptures, in a Synagogue in Nazareth saying to the Jews at the Synagogue, “today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.” (Luke 4:21) We can read from the gospels in comparison with Isaiah chapter 61 that Jesus of Nazareth did not meet the criteria of Isaiah 61 that he is claiming to be the fulfiller of in Luke 4:18-21. If we read Isaiah 61, we can see that it speaks of fulfilling global peace, but Jesus never brought peace, but conflict that echoed throughout history after his death. Isaiah 61:2 states he would “Comfort all who morn”, but those who fallowed Jesus were led into persecution and Jesus didn’t comfort all who morn, but often led people into suffering. In the time of the “Year of the Lord’s Favor”, all injustice and unfairness is righted and God’s blessing reaches all, but the life and death of Jesus of Nazareth never brought this to pass, though he proclaimed it then, it was being fulfilled in his present time. It never was.
The way by which Jesus passively admits he is the Son of God, is not the conduct a true Messiah would take, only admitting under scrutiny a few odd times, that he is the King of God’s Kingdom on Earth and keeping almost entirely secret in retreat, hiding in personal sanctity and shrouded secrecy, instead of outwardly announcing his divinity and confirming his claims with miracles, to all who needed evidence. Jesus is scripted in the bible to have hidden not only his identity, but his alleged miraculous works.
The only time in the bible that Jesus was quoted to have referred to Himself directly using the words “God’s Son” was not a direct outward confession but in the form of a question and was actually in defense of accusations of his blaspheme (John 10:36) and not a direct Herald to Messiahship, which would have been most appropriate, if he was the true Messiah.
(John 10:36 NIV) 36what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, 'I am God's Son'?
Jesus was unable to persuade a great majority of people, in his lifetime, that he was Christ and was never crowned as the King of the Jews, the people whom he preferred to minister to over the gentiles, but was crowned blasphemer with a tiara of thorns, at the will of the Jews, the very people he sought to preach his message to. Why didn’t Jesus use the miraculous power of God, to confirm any divinity he had, to those who were reasonably doubtful and unrelenting to gullibility? Why would the Messiah, not fight to be known to the world as exactly what He is and exactly what He stands for, instead of hiding it in secret?
(Mark 8:11-12 NIV) The Pharisees came and began to question Jesus. To test him, they asked him for a sign from heaven. He sighed deeply and said, "Why does this generation ask for a miraculous sign? I tell you the truth, no sign will be given to it."
Jesus was unwilling to announce definitely that he himself was Christ and rejected the idea of proving his anointing with miracles, or simply couldn’t. Why was Jesus never directly concise and straight forward in his claims, if he was in fact the divine prophet of God, Christ, the Son of God or God Himself and if he was why didn’t he prove it? Why wouldn’t the deliverer of God’s truth, also be the one who proves the truth removing all doubt and argument? How has the world benefited without proof that God exists? And how would it have benefited with unanimous proof that there is a God and what He commands of us? Why under the scrutiny of the Pharisees, if Jesus in fact obtained the power of God, did he fail to perform a life saving miracle that would have proven rumors of his divinity, providing him freedom to continue his ministry and healing, which would have further established his message in the world as truth? Why, if Jesus was the Christ who bore the “truth” of our Heavenly Father did he not prove to the earth that God exists and the “truth” he spoke, confirming it with miracles, instead of leaving the World churning in conflict over what is truth and what is lie, allowing himself to be executed because of idle inaction to save his own life?
Because the truth has not been known to humanity, humankind has been churning in evil, overcome by Satan’s lies. The truth of God being known across the world would bring peace to our human kind, for there would be no arguments as to what God commands of us. If Jesus of Nazareth had the power to deliver the entire Earth the truth and the power of God, to confirm the truth and heal the World, but instead allowed his own execution, after only 3 years of ministry, leaving humanity with more arguments and conflict than before, he failed Earth and is in a large part to blame for the destruction that fallowed his failure in consequence, because of Earth not having the truth, healing and peace. Jesus of Nazareth’s 3 years of ministry were unfulfilling, but Christianity glorifies Jesus of Nazareth’s death and resurrection as fulfillment, in spite of the poverty Jesus left the world with, to suffer and churn in conflict over his existence. Assuming he had power greater than a mortal man, we can obviously observe that Jesus of Nazareth was a failure upon the Earth with great wasted potential.
The Christian Trinity Theory
Christians testify belief in monotheism, which is the belief that there is one all powerful God that rules the universe, but also believe in the trinity theory which defies belief in God’s absolute oneness and considers God to be divided in to three different and separate states of being that are simultaneously one Triad. In their belief, they divide three different elements of their God, God the father, God the son and God the Holy Spirit, as existences that are separate from one another and in different realms of being, though still consider them all together elements of one Absolute Creator, the God Head. Christians believe that the Father is not the Son and that the Son is not the Father, that the Father is not the Holy Spirit and nor the Holy Spirit the Father, that the Holy Spirit is not the Son, and to them too the Son isn’t the Holy Spirit, but contrary to this definite separation and categorization, they in fact believe together that these three entities are all parts of one Triadic God, in different and separate forms of being, uniting in Trinity.
The Christian trinity theory states the father and the son and the Holy Spirit are all co-equal, co-eternal and co-existent, separately united as one God at core, but individually separate from one another in their different states of existence. Their diagrams of trinity connect the three of them, as three separate points of a triangle that meet together only in their core uniting as God and not point to point.
The diagram bellow illustrates the Christian Trinity Theory.
The Christian trinity theory defies monotheism by separating God into three separate forms that are co-equal, co-eternal and co-existent elements of one God Head, existing simultaneously. By separating God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit and considering them three separate deities that are all different God elements of one Triadic God in various simultaneous forms of being, you are considering Polytheism, the belief in multiple God’s.
The theory of trinity dates back to different pagan faiths of the ancient ages and is not entirely unique to the Christian faith, but has been cultivating amongst humanity in various forms for thousands upon thousands of years. A Triad, in religion and mythology, is a group of three associated gods that unite as one force. Triads have existed, not only in the Christian faith, but many different faiths, from many different ages and civilizations including the Greek, Roman, Sumerian, Babylonian and Egyptian civilizations amongst many.
An example of another religious trinity that exists, like how Christians believe that God consists of the Trinity of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit, is the Hindu Triad Trimurti, that consists of Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva. Both these examples are different various trinity theories that divide a higher, divine, Triadic being polytheistically into three separate Godly elements. The Triad Trimurti contains different Godly elements of one being that all have different attributes and states of existence yet all form one highest being, which is how the Christian belief divides their Triadic God into the Trinity of God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. Christians who believe in the Christian view of trinity do not accept true monotheism and believe and worship three different forms of God or three God’s, which is “technically” Polytheism, like the beliefs of Hinduism and the Trinity of Trimurti.
The ancient Sumerians dating back to over four and a half thousand years ago around 2500 BC had a triad consisting of Anna, Enlil, and Enki, who were also, ages later technically and historically the same figures of the Babylonian triad that consisted of Anu, lord of heaven, Bel, lord of Earth, and Ea, lord of the abyss, who united ruling the Universe as one triadic force. The Babylonian’s were influenced by the early Sumerian beliefs in a triad and they took and modified those beliefs and philosophies, altering the theories revolving around the God’s uniquely. Bel in the Chaldaic language means Baal which many historians believe is the same Syrian God Baal, who the early Israelites, worshiped alongside Ashera and Yahweh, before they became monotheist after King Josiah enforced a ban of Ashera and Baal, permitting only Yahweh’s worship, before the Babylonian exile of the Judeans in around 589 BC.
In ancient Greek mythology, Zeus God of Heaven and King of the God's, Poseidon God of the Seas, and Hades God of the Underworld together formed a triadic force of governing, and were also identified differently in Roman Mythology as a Triad consisting of Jupiter God of Sky and King of Heaven, Saturn God of land and agriculture, whose son was Neptune God of the Seas and Pluto God of the Dead.
The Ancient Egyptians placed gods in formations of triads that usually consisted of a goddess, a god, and their son and since they believed the Gods were Godly mortals, they believed the son was destined to take his father's place after his death and was his exact counterpart and coequal destined to bare a son that would replace it when it passes on.
The above examples are varying different examples of Pagan Triads under various conditions and circumstances, in which Godly deities are united together, to form one unified force governing creation. Some of these theories are not entirely in the same forms of the Christian Trinity or the Hindu Trinity, in which three separate existences become one total single existence, but they are Triadic concepts of Godly unity and oneness that have developed in our human civilizations and would have helped inspire the concepts of Christian Trinity.
The Christian “Christ”
"Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one!" (Deuteronomy. 6:4)
There are many arguments in the bible that contradict trinity, most obvious being the fact that the word trinity itself is not once mentioned in the Christian bible. Trinity in the bible is conjured in the minds of Christians, after observing fragmented allusions contained in scriptures that suggest a sense of unity between God and Jesus of Nazareth, who they falsely believe in Christ. Christians take these allusive scriptures and apply them to their theological concept of Trinity and judging by their interpretations of the bible, create their own beliefs. Trinity was created by the church in attempts to further glorify Jesus and is not defined from the bible, but formulated by interpreting dogma in the scriptures.
Christians believe the Christ came already as a man named Jesus of Nazareth, who was crucified in submission to the will of the Pharisees, at the hands of Roman law and sacrificed for the sins of God’s children to be forgiven. Jesus is not and was not Christ and has been throughout history the most falsely glorified human being to have ever existed, exploited by Satan throughout history and used by Satan to exploit the masses into believing lies about God and the Messiah. Worship of Jesus is idolatry and blaspheme, not only because he is not the true Christ, but because Christians are glorifying him as a mortal entity equal to a God, and placing him before God claiming that it is he, the alleged Son of God, who is the way, when the way is fallowing and fulfilling the intent of God the Father, to fulfill the Messianic Commission of Salvation as one body of Christ.
Christians believe in a Trinity theory that describes a Triadic God consisting of 3 different elements of God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, considering them Co-Equal, Co-Eternal and Co-Existent in the Godhead and literally place in their minds, the peasant rabbi turned revolutionary Jesus of Nazareth on the same scale as a God, claiming his divinity is equal to that of a Titan's, which is totally ludicrous, blasphemous and is truly idolatry. Jesus is not the Christ, and the True Christ did not come 2000 years ago and die in the flesh upon the cross for all of humanity, but was destined to arrive now in Armageddon, to face and destroy the antichrist (the Cursed Soul of Satan incarnate in mortality) achieving the victory of God over the Spirit of the devil and the salvation of all of humanity through the destruction of the devil’s advocate and the deliverance of God’s gospel and power to all the world.
The True Messianic Unity of God and Christ
Bellow is a Diagram of the Messianic Duality and Unity of God and Christ.
God the Father and Christ the Son are two separate Holy existences and divine entities that are united both as one Holy Spirit that is divided duality (one could consider them divided dyadically, using a more proper term). The two different beings are both one soul and therefore neither the Son nor the Father are separate spiritually form each other, though they are separate mentally and physically, in different states of existence, dually. God is the Father and Christ is the Son and both are two different forms of one Holy Soul. The Holy Spirit does not exist separately alone but in duality as both God and Christ, as two separate existences simultaneously existing at once in different realms of being.
Christ the Son is begotten as a Mortal and exists as a creation of God, created to worship God on the Earth by bringing salvation through the deliverance of the Holy Power and Truth and destroying the antichrist. The Christ exists as a manifestation that is a temporary existence containing the same Holy Spirit of the Lord. Christ will die after its mortality and God will be one. Only God, the highest form of the Holy Spirit was the beginning and has always existed as the force of creation and the giver of life. God chose not to be Almighty and All Powerful, creating the Heavens and creating life and all the begotten spirits of God's children, manifest with power and freedom under their own to control.
The Christ in reality cannot be considered a God because it exists as a Prophetic Human Sage and God cannot be considered the Christ, because God is a Powerful, Heavenly Deity that is existing in an Immortal Godly form as a Titan, yet both are the same Spirit existing simultaneously in different states and forms of being. The true Christ is the incarnation of God’s Holy Spirit, and is not in league with the Holy Spirit’s highest state of being, the state of Godship, but exists as an Avatar in the bondage of mortality and a mortal vessel containing God’s Immortal Spirit, living as a threshold for God to pour out power, truth and justice upon the Earth. The Christ is the inferior incarnation of the Holy Spirit and in comparison with the highest state of the Holy Spirit’s Titanic being Christ is a lesser being when placed in proportion. God works with the Christ and through the Christ, but is limited by the Christ’s own free will, its mortal weakness and the laws of physics that govern the Christ’s reality, which can only be broken through fulfilling the Laws of the Universe, in the War between God and Satan, as stated in the Messianic Gospel.
The Christ should not be placed in a mortal form on a pedestal first before God and worshiped first before the Lord, because in its mortal form, the Holy Spirit incarnate as Christ is a Prophetic servant and a human being that is birthed to worship God, with righteous actions, protecting good and vanquishing evil. To worship a mortal man, a prophet, or even the inferior prophetic incarnation of the Holy Spirit, in a position before the Most High God, is a form of idolatry and ultimately needless for survival and unnecessary for ones salvation. Christ is God’s servant and the Prophetic Messenger of Heaven, sent into the dangers of mortal bondage to fulfill a Messianic purpose of delivering Salvation through the destruction of the antichrist and the deliverance of God’s gospel and power. Christ is not meant to be worshiped, when it is the source of the power, the truth and life itself, God, the highest state of the Holy Spirit that we must all worship together by fulfilling God’s laws and commandments.
For more information on the true Christ please read the Messianic Gospel.
Scrutinizing Jesus of
As the saying goes, “it is the spark that kindles the flame, that is to blame for the firestorm”, (or lack there of).
First we broke down Jesus of Nazareth in Judaism, Islam and Christianity, then we looked at the historical references in the bible and their lack of reliability, then we considered and criticized Jesus of Nazareth’s claim to divinity and now we are going to scrutinize the actions and sayings of Jesus the bible describes.
We must very strongly define the work of a leader based upon the consequences of those who fallow. Jesus of Nazareth’s teachings never provided our world with the essential knowledge to best guide us in our fight for survival, did not give us the knowledge to overcome evil, did not establish a system of governing that would prevail in the world’s maelstrom of powers and also did not establish a church that would prevail upon Earth, as our entire world is in its final days, after all Jesus said and did, is being condemned by a humanity Jesus didn’t save.
Jesus is rumored to have, among many things, been miraculously able calm the storms, feed the thousands, to cure the diseased and disabled or walk on water, but most propagated of all Jesus is rumored to have delivered us salvation through his death and resurrection. Though rumors of Jesus have, over the last 2000 years, reached almost the entire world and have been throughout history accepted by billions of people, Jesus of Nazareth’s life and death, what he said and did and what he has inspired to consequentially fallow his presence on Earth, never had an impact upon the Earth that was worthy and powerful enough to be considered the deliverance of Christ, for it did not bring Earth peace or stop evil from prevailing amongst humanity and destroying the World.
In fact Jesus himself personally had very little impact in his day and age. It was the movement of Christianity that fallowed his death, as his apostles spread the faith across the world, which led to Jesus’ world renowned story being something we all hear of. This movement however, has provided very poorly for our world. It is not the solution to global poverty, environmental destruction or war amongst nations. It is today too passive an influence that is often ignored when dealing with the world’s most critical issues, not at all what can be considered God’s Kingdom on Earth. In the end, after all promises are made and broken, Christianity falls short of the Messianic Kingdom and Jesus falls short of the Messiah.
If Jesus of Nazareth was the spark of Christianity on Earth and now that Christianity has had 2000 years to persuade the world of its dogma, yet has failed, did Jesus of Nazareth not also fail in his mission of spreading his message, by failing to spark a movement that would succeed on Earth in fully converting the masses?
Under the law of Action and Consequence, the actions and sayings of Jesus of Nazareth should be most held accountable for the failure of Christianity in our world, before the actions and sayings of anyone ells responsible for Christianities failure, because Jesus was the origin and an imperfect seed baring imperfect fruit. Like a butterfly effect, Jesus of Nazareth’s influence has resonated throughout history and in the end the church he began has ultimately failed its purpose upon the Earth; failing to serve God by fulfilling the Lord’s will. Therefore, Jesus too has failed his purpose, failing to establish a church on Earth, worthy of God’s glory and failing to bring the world teachings that would prevail against the evil corruptions existing amongst us.
If Jesus had the power to live his life preaching his ministry and delivering miracles that not only would prove his message to unbelievers and confirm the gospel to the faithful but would powerfully heal the world’s people, but hadn’t, shouldn’t he be taken into account for all the disease, poverty, conflict and tragedy that exists amongst us?
What did Jesus of Nazareth ever say or do to benefit mankind upon the Earth, compared to what he didn’t say and didn’t do to help mankind or what he said and did against what was best for humanity?
In this section we will next scrutinize the different sayings and actions of Jesus of Nazareth that are located particularly in the biographical gospels of Mathew, Mark, Luke and John, but also in other references found in other parts of the bible or in historical documents archeology has uncovered.
While scrutinizing Jesus of Nazareth’s historical actions and sayings we will be considering his accountability for what he said and did, considering his actions and sayings have had an extremely profound influence in the world and a severe consequence that has not blessed our world with peace, but has caused division and turmoil amongst billions of people. We will take into consideration throughout scrutinizing Jesus of Nazareth’s actions and sayings, Jesus and his early church’s accountability for the failure of Christianity and what negative influence Christianity has on our world’s people. As well we will also consider what good Christianity has contributed to the world, in order to properly contrast and express truth accurately in all fairness.
Jesus' Way
Jesus was idolatrous and placed himself directly before the Lord, self righteously and arrogantly above the rest of his fellow Jews, generally claiming not only that he was a deity, but that he was the only way unto the father and that humanity must believe in him to be acceptable to God and given God's mercy of salvation from hell.
Why should a man, whom never proved to the world his divinity, be the basis by which all of our souls are judged, based on whether or not each individual accepts or rejects his alleged divinity? What evidence can we see today that Jesus of Nazareth’s life is “THE WAY”, when his presence on Earth never changed the course of our planet off its path of destruction? Why assume that he provided us eternal salvation if he never provided us with mortal salvation and actually did very little to support the life of Earth by not standing against slavery, poverty and war?
(John 14:6) "Jesus said to him, 'I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.'"
The above scripture (John 14:6) is a false teaching that has been widely believed by our world's desperately gullible masses that have turned to Jesus and his creed blindly. No peasant man or king, prophet and not even the true Messiah can stand before the Most High God and say unto the people that, in its frail and finite mortal form, it is the only way through to the heavens and eternal salvation. The true Messianic Prophet of God is the one that has learned from God Himself, God’s way, and understanding God’s way, is the leader that sets the ultimate example of fallowing God, by guiding humanity along the way as the Shepard of the Lord. Even the true Messiah, must walk God’s way committing awesome actions to righteously serve God's Messianic cause of converting the blind masses, delivering to the world divine law, justice, truth, healing, peace and eternal salvation to the souls of God’s children. He must fallow the destined path of salvation and God’s way as a light to the world, guiding humanity along the path as a Shepard who walks the way and lives as a Godly example for all those who do not fallow God’s way, but live in sin on the path of damnation.
Jesus is not and was not the way and the earlier masses that fallowed his path were led into persecution and suffering or took up arms to fight in a crusade and to persecute in the inquisitions. Throughout history there has been persecution and conflict caused by Christians or brought upon Christians in catastrophes like the battles between Protestants and Catholics in the Protestant Reformation and between Protestant and Catholic today in Northern Ireland, in wars between Christians and Muslims in the Crusades or the inquisition against Christians Heretics. Today, televangelists and others use the name of God to reap huge profits from gullible masses, while priests commit horrible acts of pedophilia. Christians throughout much of Asia, Africa and the Middle East are largely targeted for persecution and Christians throughout the Canada, the USA and the rest of the Western world are mostly idle and inactive in God’s true intent of peace, living indulging in greed, while billions suffer in poverty. All the while Satan’s plans to slay our souls are being fulfilled with the global destruction of the Armageddon.
Now ask yourself how has Christianity helped save our world from the Apocalypse?
Jesus of Nazareth has come and gone and left the world in a worsened state of turmoil than it was already in before he came. In his time his presence was lightly felt and though his influence has explosively echoed throughout the generations who fallowed him, he himself left no words or teachings behind to equip the world with the essential principles and teachings that would guide it to peace and aid us in survival as an endangered human race; endanger of killing ourselves. The world, over the generations upon generations, churned in conflicts and Christianity was a source of many conflicts and religious wars fought over differences in beliefs.
Christianity had its climax of world power, influence and control during the Middle Ages, during the reign of the Holy Roman Empire, claiming its reign was God’s reign, but the corruption of their empire was betrayal against God and a manifestation of Satanic intent fulfilled. The teachings of Jesus did not, during the zenith of power in the
Christendom has always been waging a daring gamble with the devil because of Sin and has always been hypocritical, largely because Christians don’t believe righteous deeds are commanded by God. Instead, submissive gullible beliefs and traditional ritualistic practices that, when taken into account of their physical consequence on Earth, are no more than false ideas, promises, words and practices that never truly manifest a Godly impact, like the righteous deeds that bless the life of Earth. They are truly only the selfish hopes, acts and sayings of humans serving to comfort themselves with excuses, to cover up their guilt and damnation, without actually repenting of the sin that is destroying us all.
Christianity has not prevailed with its creed. It is being overcome by Satan’s influence and the sin of the world. Many Christians live enslaved to the worldly, secular society in submission to global suicide and live enslaved to religion, surrendering to ancient teachings and practices, conjured by primitively superstitious Jews that are manhandled and filthy; filled with the devil’s deception. The way they believe they fallow is being overcome by the devil and all they rely upon today for feelings of security is their presumptuous beliefs that they will be delivered in the end to the heavens above. They do find security in the hope that actions we take to fulfill the Messianic Destiny, will not be in vain, but will bless us with salvation, for they for the most part shun and discourage the idea of doing good works, believing through their gullible and presumptuous “FAITH ALONE” they will be justified, though it’s a faith that is not based on logic, but false hope, as they allow the world to end.
The Christians preaching of “the way” today have turned their back on fighting against Armageddon, towards Jesus, believing he is Christ and the way. They are convinced they will have eternal salvation even if they surrender to sin allowing the destruction of the apocalypse to unfold, without attempting to save the planet. Most of them are living typically moderate lives, indulging in wants, in submission to the secular systems of the divided Nations that are dooming the planet in a global suicide. They are basically sitting ducks, with the sin of the world festering within, like a deadly strain of H5N1 (avian bird flu), meanwhile they live with a hakun matata (no worries) mentality, believing they are saved by their ignorant beliefs, when they are surely as damned unto hell as the rest of the world they abandon to fate.
There is no great Christian uprising to save Earth. Christianity has to often been a motivation, persuading people to submit to destruction, content believing that we can do nothing to defeat evil and that salvation was won against Satan with the death and resurrection of a false Christ. It sadly has not has been an inspiration to manifest world peace, put an end to poverty or to save our environments, protecting biological diversity. It instead has allowed the planet’s problems to escalate into the global crisis of our current end days. The beliefs excuse all of the world’s problems away, with a superstitious formula you can obtain with a quick dose of Jesus, a convenient amnesty against evil.
Jesus' VS Slavery and Racism
Gandhi said, "Be the change you wish to see in the world."
The bible says nothing against slavery and racism, but supports these two extreme evils throughout the Old and New Testament. We can witness first hand today the evils slavery and racism have caused throughout history and the death and suffering brought down upon the innocent by the arrogant who believed they were superior. One should then know the Christian bible throughout history has fueled the evils of slavery and racism, permitting, supporting and defining appropriate practice of human enslavement and the importance of racism, against non-Jewish Gentiles. The bible both preserved supported and inspired slavery and racism and was a great tool of the devil contributing to human conflict and suffering.
During the American Civil war, the Confederate states of
"[Slavery] was established by decree of Almighty God...it is sanctioned in the Bible, in both Testaments, from Genesis to Revelation...it has existed in all ages, has been found among the people of the highest civilization, and in nations of the highest proficiency in the arts." Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederate States of
"There is not one verse in the Bible inhibiting slavery, but many regulating it. It is not then, we conclude, immoral." Rev. Alexander Campbell
"The right of holding slaves is clearly established in the Holy Scriptures, both by precept and example." Rev. R. Furman, D.D., Baptist, of
Jesus is never once quoted to have spoken against slavery or racism and he himself was racist towards gentiles. A true Messiah would have taken a stand against all sin, not excluding slavery, racism and any other injustice, for they are all evil and all are from the same source, the devil. Slavery and racism have been two of the world’s greatest problems and ultimately are condoned in the Christian Doctrine.
Jesus never showed once he cared to stand against racism or slavery, but did in fact speak racist comments and showed he cared for the Jews more than the Gentiles.
Mark 7:24-30 and Matthew 15:21-28 both record the story of a Gentile woman coming to Jesus and begging him to heal her daughter, who was demon possessed. In Mark 7:24-30 Jesus' first was silent and then was requested by his disciples to send her away. Jesus said “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.” to dispel her from him, but she then fell at his feet and begged Jesus desperately. A moment later Jesus’ second responded saying, “First let the children eat all they want,” he told her, “for it is not right to take the children's bread and toss it to their dogs.’”.
Jesus clearly rejects this woman racially, as she sought the power of God and healing, because she is a Gentile, but the insulting racial slur he used, comparing her with a dog, ultimately reviles the lack of separation and disunity Jesus obtained from the arrogant and racist Jewish views of the time and shows Jesus is clearly a racist.
Bellow Mark 7:24-30 and Matthew 15:21-28 are stated as reference.
Mark 7:24-30 (New International Version)
24Jesus left that place and went to the vicinity of Tyre.[a] He entered a house and did not want anyone to know it; yet he could not keep his presence secret. 25In fact, as soon as she heard about him, a woman whose little daughter was possessed by an evil[b] spirit came and fell at his feet. 26The woman was a Greek, born in Syrian
27"First let the children eat all they want," he told her, "for it is not right to take the children's bread and toss it to their dogs."
28"Yes, Lord," she replied, "but even the dogs under the table eat the children's crumbs."
29Then he told her, "For such a reply, you may go; the demon has left your daughter."
30She went home and found her child lying on the bed, and the demon gone.
Matthew 15:21-28 (New International Version)
21Leaving that place, Jesus withdrew to the region of
23Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, "Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us."
24He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of
25The woman came and knelt before him. "Lord, help me!" she said.
26He replied, "It is not right to take the children's bread and toss it to their dogs."
27"Yes, Lord," she said, "but even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table."
28Then Jesus answered, "Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted." And her daughter was healed from that very hour.
How can this false prophet, Jesus, boast he is the way, if he advocates racism and does not firmly stand against the evils of racism, with the principles of Universal Equality and Universal Family? Jesus was conformed to the Jewish society and was brought up fallowing unclean and untrue practices of strict Jewish superstition that are entirely unrighteous. His view of the Gentiles was a common perception in his culture and was conjured by Satan and is most definitely sinful.
Racism is a sin and can be defined in two ways, hate for a different race or favor and love for your own race over other races and Jesus gives us an example, in his own words, of the racist sin the Jews had towards the Gentiles. How can Jesus be considered Christ if he was only looking to serve the Jews and unwilling to see the Jews and Gentiles as equal? Racism and partiality is one of the greatest causes of human conflict there is and if Jesus were to live up to who and what he claimed to be , he would have done the righteous thing and stand against it, teaching the people of the world the essential principle of Universalism.
Jesus states bellow another example of racist, partiality favoring the Jews over the Gentiles, telling his disciples not to go among the Gentiles or into the lands of the Samaritans.
(Mathew 10:5-6) 5These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: "Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans. 6Go rather to the lost sheep of
I stress the point that Jesus was raised into a society of strict racism and discrimination towards Gentiles (non Jews) and did not separate himself from the Jewish collective of arrogant self-righteous and racist bigotry. Jesus did not speak against racism once in the bible, but is quoted in the bible to have warned his disciples to not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans, but instead to go to the lost sheep of
A true prophet of God knows God’s children upon the Earth are all loved equally by God and there is no chosen race of people in God’s favor. This prophet would command repentance against all evils, including racism, but instead of turning to the Gentiles, Jesus went only to the lost sheep of Israel and was crucified, making a critical error by not turning to all the worlds people Universally, but instead turning to a arrogant and discriminating Jewish society, filled with arrogance, racism, prejudice, stereotyping, bigotry and obviously among many other flaws, lack of tolerance towards self appointed prophets, false Messiah's and their blaspheme.
Jesus and many of the apostles were persecuted by the Jews and Christianity was greatly persecuted until around the early 3rd century when the conversion of Emperor Constantine the Great gave Christians safety from persecution and the
Racial conflict of the early church
Some of the largest conflicts amongst the members of the early Christian Church were sourced from issues revolving around Gentile converts. The early church debated whether or not to accept gentiles into the movement in the first place, and if accepted, whether or not the Gentiles should convert to Jewish tradition, by keeping the laws of Moses, requiring circumcision among other things. Members of the early church were divided on these key issues and the church was put in jeopardy and was threatened by a break up over problems that Jesus had not addressed.
Gentiles rarely and almost never converted to Judaism, partly because of the religious obligations to be initiated into Judaism and partly because of strong hatred towards the Jews they viewed as arrogant bigots.
Conditions for converting to Judaism today reflect how one converted to ancient Judaism 2000 years ago and include.
1) Mitzvahs - He must believe in God and the divinity of the Torah, as well as accept upon himself to observe all 613 mitzvahs (commandments) of the Torah.
2) Milah - Male converts must undergo circumcision by a qualified "Mohel." If he was previously circumcised by a doctor, he then undergoes a ritual called "hatafas dam" a ritual circumcision done by drawing a drop of blood from the penis.
3) Mikveh - All converts must immerse in the Mikveh - a ritual bath linked to a reservoir of rain water (similar to a baptism).
All of the above must be done before a court of three Jewish men who themselves believe in God, accept the divinity of the Torah, and observe the mitzvahs.
The strict Jewish laws make it very difficult for a Gentile to accept converting to Judaism. The conversion itself could be considered by some to be a very bizarre and unpleasant experience. This unnecessary experience would be enough to discourage many from joining the early Christian church, if they needed to observe Jewish laws first, in order to be considered Christians.
Though Gentiles in the ancient age rarely converted to Judaism, at around 200 C.E the population of Gentile Christians outweighed the population of Jewish Christians, largely because of the Apostle Paul's work amongst the masses, converting the Gentiles. Paul is credited for being the one who brought Christianity to the Gentiles, throughout the heart of the
(Acts 21:17-36)
Paul's Arrival at
17When we arrived at Jerusalem, the brothers received us warmly. 18The next day Paul and the rest of us went to see James, and all the elders were present. 19Paul greeted them and reported in detail what God had done among the Gentiles through his ministry. 20When they heard this, they praised God. Then they said to Paul: "You see brother, how many thousands of Jews have believed, and all of them are zealous for the law. 21They have been informed that you teach all the Jews who live among the Gentiles to turn away from Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children or live according to our customs. 22What shall we do? They will certainly hear that you have come, 23so do what we tell you. There are four men with us who have made a vow. 24Take these men, join in their purification rites and pay their expenses, so that they can have their heads shaved. Then everybody will know there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you yourself are living in obedience to the law. 25As for the Gentile believers, we have written to them our decision that they should abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality."
26The next day Paul took the men and purified himself along with them. Then he went to the temple to give notice of the date when the days of purification would end and the offering would be made for each of them.
Paul Arrested
27When the seven days were nearly over, some Jews from the province of
30The whole city was aroused, and the people came running from all directions. Seizing Paul, they dragged him from the temple, and immediately the gates were shut. 31While they were trying to kill him, news reached the commander of the Roman troops that the whole city of
33The commander came up and arrested him and ordered him to be bound with two chains. Then he asked who he was and what he had done. 34Some in the crowd shouted one thing and some another, and since the commander could not get at the truth because of the uproar, he ordered that Paul be taken into the barracks. 35When Paul reached the steps, the violence of the mob was so great he had to be carried by the soldiers. 36The crowd that followed kept shouting, "Away with him!"
This may have been the greatest conflict within the early church and we can blame the fact that their false idol Jesus, never truly to any great extent supported Universal Unity and Peace amongst Jews and Gentiles. Because the leader and teacher Jesus never liberated his students and followers from the strict Jewish lifestyles, conflict arose amidst the early church over the old Jewish traditions and the addition of the Christian philosophy. Again, is it not the bad seed, baring bad fruit that is to blame most for the corruption amongst the early church? Racism in the early church greatly inhibited its spread and if this is the key to our salvation, the complications and conflicts amongst the early church may have led to the damnation of billions upon billions of people who were led not to believe.
Ironically it was the Gentile emperor Constantine who converted to Christianity and in 313 AD issued the "Edict of Milan," which commanded tolerance of Christianity throughout the
One of the most critical errors Jesus made in his pursuits of ministry was turning only to the racist Jews in partiality out of racism towards the Gentiles. It was the Jews that had him executed and without the Gentiles, Christianity would never have become what is has become today. Without the help of the Gentiles, Christianity would still be a small Jewish movement suppressed by the world’s superpowers and persecuted. So why then, did Jesus turn only to the Jews and not the Gentiles?
What would have happened to Christianity if Paul never began to convert the Gentiles? Christianity wouldn’t have been supported by masses of the Gentiles,
Jesus himself is not to credit for the spread of Christianity amongst the Gentiles, because he himself was strictly seeking to only minister to the Jews and rarely accepted serving Gentiles. We can credit Paul and other early church members like Peter who stood up for ministering Christianity to the Gentiles, though against the grain of major Judeo Christian opposition, and can credit the Emperor Constantine for supporting to protect and enforce Christianity amidst the Roman Empire.
Considering that Christianity states that only faith in Jesus of Nazareth can justify oneself for salvation, I ask then, if persecution of Christianity hadn’t stopped at the will of Constantine, reducing the resistance against Christianity and helping it spread across the Roman Empire, would this mean that masses of those who weren’t reached with the Christian dogma because of persecution would go to hell? Would our souls be damned to hell, if Christianity wasn’t preached to us, because the early Christian Church maintained segregation laws and never accepted ministering to us because of our race? Should the Christians then not be accountable for our decent into hell because they were racist and unwilling to share with us their creed? Should Jesus not be accountable if we go to hell because his ministry and gospel on Earth was given strictly in favor of the Jews, who strictly segregated from the Gentiles in the early church?
Jesus’ Promises
While promoting himself and his vision of God, Jesus made many false claims and many false promises, promising to fulfill the desires of those who would be loyal to him.
(John 14:12-14 12) I tell you the truth, anyone who has faith in me will do what I have been doing. He will do even greater things than these, because I am going to the Father. 13And I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that the Son may bring glory to the Father. 14You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it.
(Mark 9:23) 23" 'If you can'?" said Jesus. "Everything is possible for him who believes."
(Mark 11:24) 24 "Therefore I say to you, whatever things you ask when you pray, believe that you receive them, and you will have them.
(Luke 11:9) And I say unto you, Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you.
(John 10:27-28), "My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me; 28 and I give eternal life to them, and they shall never perish; and no one shall snatch them out of My hand."
Jesus is promising to serve our every command and obey as we ask of him, giving us what we will, but this is false considering that prayers to Jesus are never answered by him and are idolatrously cast to a blasphemes false prophet that does not have the power to answer prayers. It is God who delivers blessings; whether you pray to God as Jesus, Jehovah, Yahweh or Allah, our one Lord hears our calls and answers our prayers according to His own plans and not ours. God is not a God of favors blessed only upon those who are His favorites, but a God strategically at work against Satan, wielding blessings according to His own plans to bless us against the devil’s work to curse us.
The chances are self-centered prayers for blessings for yourself or those you favor who are close to you will not be met, because God has his own plans and priorities and they are not your wants for more of what you want, if you do not need it. God does not want to bless already indulgent and wealthy Christians by meeting their desires and carnal wants, when there is a world full of suffering lives that first of all need God’s blessing of not only physical needs, but especially their spiritual needs of God’s victory on Earth over the devil, through the safe deliverance of Christ, the fulfillment of Christ’s destiny; and through Christ, the deliverance of God’s Gospel, power, authority and the destruction of the antichrist in Armageddon; as clearly stated in the Messianic Gospel of Christ.
International Poverty
- Nearly 1.2 billion people do not have clean water to drink.
- Over 2.6 billion people do not have access to basic sanitation.
- About 24,000 people die every day from hunger or hunger-related causes. Three-fourths of the deaths are children under the age of five.
- Some 800 million people around the globe suffer from hunger and malnutrition.
- More than 10 percent of children in developing countries die before the age of five.
- 2.8 billion people live on less that $2 a day, and 1.2 billion people live on less than $1 a day.
- In the next 25 years, an estimated 2 billion people will be added to the world's population--almost all of them in developing countries.
- More than 1.8 million children die each year, roughly one child every 15 seconds, from water and sanitation-related Diarrhoeal diseases
God is not interested in blessing only Christians by answering their selfish prayers. God wills to bless everyone on Earth with the gift of salvation (not satisfaction), meeting everyone’s physical and spiritual needs, against Satan’s plans to destroy us on Earth and condemn us all to Hell. God wills to bless first those who are most in need of help, suffering without what they need to survive, before those whose basic needs are met and wills to bless the whole world with the deliverance of Christ, the fulfillment of Christ’s destiny and through Christ, the deliverance of the truth, power, authority and justice of God, manifesting the redolence of eternal salvation.
The prayers of humanity do not change God’s plans which are already to save us, acting in complete harmony with manifesting His intentions of victory over the devil. God’s will is to fulfill blessing the common good of all who exist in the universe. He does not bend to the desires and wants of the Christian’s prayers.
In developing Nations of the world, billions of people are in need of help and Christians all over the world, living in luxury, most often only offer their prayers and best wishes, claiming all they can do is depend on Jesus and his power, ignoring their own power to take action and if they do actually give, they give what little change they can spare, still taking the time out in these final days to indulge their desires and to pray to Jesus for themselves and for their wants to be fulfilled.
Even in the worlds most industrialized Nation in the world, the
It is the evils of greed that plague Christians, more than even their false beliefs, because more than the misunderstandings and false faiths, greed has had throughout history the greatest negative influence on the Earth and its people, inspiring the most evil to manifest. Greed is the source of all evil and the devil’s original sin and is the evil that’s leading our world into total destruction. Christians could provide a lot of help to those in the world who are desperately needy, but few give more charity than their religiously obligated tithe and deposit their donations to a local church that typically spends the finances on its self and its own people’s wants and not the needs of others.
Jesus also, in addition to promising us our prayers, promised safety and protection from hunger and thirst, in exchange for turning to him.
(John 6:35) Then Jesus declared, "I am the bread of life. He who comes to me will never go hungry, and he who believes in me will never be thirsty.
The above scripture promises that those who turn to Jesus will never hunger and that who ever believes will never thirst, which is, based on historical fact, a false promise and a lie. Many Christians who devoutly turned and believed in Jesus, fallowing their religious beliefs, perished of starvation and thirst, often as a direct consequence for fallowing Jesus, which proves that the promise above contained in the bible is false. In both the Old and New Testament, there are many false promises that have not been kept throughout history. Like the promises the Israelites believe were made directly by the god of the bible, specifically to Abraham and his decedents the Israelites, were broken, the promises that are made by Jesus are factually wrong, looking at the evidence of the suffering that loyal Christians have gone through. In no way is turning to Jesus safety and security, it’s only an excuse to feel safe and secure and a false source of comfort.
Christianity has been a tool of the devil to inspire ignorance and Jesus’ death and resurrection is only an excuse providing Christians with their feelings of security. These excuses are cursing them and betraying them as Armageddon approaches to reap their souls and their idle existences allow it to happen. Our only hope is fallowing our God’s commandments to unite against the devil, in peace, Universally in Messiahship with one another and seeing God’s will fulfilled, by manifesting it amongst us.
My statements on (John 6:35) can be argued from the bible, from contrary scriptures in the bible that state that definitely those who become Christians will surely face persecution, but these arguments also contradict (John 6:35) that promises safety and also can be scrutinized.
(Acts 14:22) 22strengthening the disciples and encouraging them to remain true to the faith. "We must go through many hardships to enter the
(2 Timothy 3:12) 12In fact, everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted,
(Matthew 5:10-12) Blessed [are] they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are ye, when [men] shall revile you, and persecute [you], and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great [is] your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.
(Matthew 16:24-26) 24Then Jesus said to his disciples, "If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. 25For whoever wants to save his life[a] will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will find it. 26What good will it be for a man if he gains the whole world, yet forfeits his soul? Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul?
The above scriptures state persecution will be ensured for Jesus’ followers and even state hardships are required to enter God’s kingdom and live godly lives on Earth.
Dying for a noble known cause towards saving Earth or other lives is worth pain and suffering, but to die for a presumptuous faith that has ultimately no validation and no true confirmation, is utter stupidity, considering the superstitious beliefs people have settled with and pursue instead of perusing what is factually know to be right, against what we factually know to be wrong. Instead of two people of different beliefs dying and killing to fight against each other in attempts to prove their faith, they could do the righteous and peaceful thing, keeping the peace and forfeiting the argument, if arguing and fighting would only result in destruction. The concepts of religions are deeply believed, but totally unproven and dying or killing to argue what is no more than theory, believing you can call down from heaven afterwards to your enemies unto hell saying “I told you so”, is a totally blind leap of stupidity, disguised as righteous faith. Sin and suffering for the cause of arguing theory and belief, is not worth the effort compared to the efforts that can be focused on reconciliation and a peaceful united effort towards a better world for all. The promise of salvation just for being persecuted to advocate superstitious beliefs is much like the promises made during the crusades by the papacy of salvation for fighting against the Muslims and Heretics, it is a false lie of the devil, created to encourage people to kill or be killed for a faith that is corrupted and filled with the lies of Satan.
Humanity must worship God by protecting, preserving and advancing life. Allowing the devil to destroy our Earth is satanic worship to the dark lord of evil itself and will condemn us to all to hell. We must be willing to sacrifice ourselves for the sake of manifesting salvation for our World, ensuring the spiritual salvation of our souls. We must live and die towards the total purging of evil amongst our Universal family, not towards presumptuous beliefs that are unreliable and definitely false. Human beings have been bound in their religious Mythological, superstitions, which have been used by the devil as excuses to provide people with the placid ignorance to turn away from its key plans of Armageddon without resistance.
Highlighting Christianities’ Failures and Successes
Christianities’ Failure
Matthew 10:34, "Don't imagine that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword!"
Throughout history Christianity has been a dominating influence in our world. Some of Christianities’ influence has been positive, influencing many great Christian men throughout history who had a powerful impact on human civilization. But, Christianity has never been an immaculate influence in the world. Its failures have caused some of the greatest catastrophes to have ever been made manifest upon the Earth and has been a force of destruction, rather than a source of creation and Godly inspiration.
Events like the Inquisitions, the Crusades and the Thirty Years War between Protestants and Catholics, in the Dark Ages, led to the deaths of millions of people and still resonate in today’s present age amidst continual religious inspired sectarian violence. Extreme suffering has been caused by the bloodied hands of Christian authorities throughout history. Christianity has caused or contributed too many of our world’s greatest disasters and has stood idly by allowing the planets’ destruction throughout our modern age. It has never been a solution for our world’s problems, but instead has been the source of many of the worst horror to have ever birthed from the womb of atrocity. It has throughout history, passively allowed evil to reign and has at many points throughout our history, walked hand and hand with the devil, instead of walking hand and hand with God.
Throughout history violence among Christians themselves, fighting over doctrine and practice, caused terrible loss of life. The many wars between sects of Christians prove entirely that within Christianity is the corrupted influence of Satan, dividing the millions against each other, with superstitious dogma. In the Middle Ages Christianity was shattered into sects of stubborn believers, who turned violently against each other at the whim of difference in faith. Christians were terribly intolerant and wicked towards each other and others of different religious affiliation, manifesting some of the wickedest diabolic evil to ever envelope the masses. This ultimately proves that the devil’s influence resides in the Christian church, rendering Christianity impure and tainted by the Diablo’s kiss.
Ask yourself, if this truly is the religion of God, why would it not be a unifying force? Why have so many millions of Christians divided with one another, often violently, over religious beliefs if this is the true faith of God? Why have the Christians been so immensely corrupted throughout History if they are truly the followers of the Messiah?
The true way of God, would not cause such immense destruction and confusion, but would be the holy awakening, all of mankind can walk in harmony with, together universally in worship of the true God. The unifying influence of the true Christ would bring all humbly to their knees before God’s mighty reign, not pin brothers and sisters against each other, in vain slaughter of innocent lives. The coming of Christ would not only bring the true message of God, but the power and might to prove and enforce God’s will upon the Earth. It would bring peace to Earth, not more turmoil and strife.
Christianities’ Successes
Christianity has influenced the development of human civilization in profound ways. It has inspired some of the greatest people to have lived, to be more loving and caring towards the world and God. People like Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King JR, Pope John Paul II, are a few of many people who have walked with adherence of God. These people have made a great impact upon our planet Earth and the humanity that resides within. They were inspired by Jesus and the Christian faith, to uphold humanitarian causes and to lead lives that were humble and clean. Jesus has influenced many people, who believe devoutly in his Christhood, in positive ways, making them more adherent to moral values. He has been the inspiration for billions of people’s faith and it is this inspiration, that often been at the source of many good deed.
As stated in the Messianic Gospel, “all good that is made manifest, is by the grace of God”. Therefore any good that has come from Christianity, has been influenced by God’s grace. This also applies to good that has come of other religions in the world. Any teachings of wisdom, whether they are from the bible, or the bhagavad gita are originated from same holy source of all divine light. They are simply shrouded in fable and deception Satan, the source of all evil, has poured out on humanity.
Though Islam, Judaism and Christianity, for example, can all be considered false, there is good in some of those who believe these regions to be the truth of God and therefore good does manifest because of these religious beliefs.
But what about the religion inspired violence or religion inspired lukewarm placidity? These religions can obviously inspire evil, just as they can inspire good, but can any of them be considered the pure way of God? I believe the answer is no.
We must look at the origin of religion itself, if we are to understand what has inspired the religious beliefs in our world today.
The Origin of Religion
The true origin of religion is shrouded in an enigmatic veil of secrecy. We can find the minute redolence of the people from ages long ago, by studying the little physical evidence they left behind, but the father back through history you travel the less is known and the greater the mystery. Because of this obvious mystery, the book World Religions- From Ancient History to the Present concludes that “the modern historian knows that it is impossible to reach the origins of religion”. Reaching this conclusion as well, we too must humble ourselves and admit we do not know the true historical origin of our religious beliefs, because we only have a limited understanding of our ancestors. We know much more about the physical artifacts they left behind, than the theories they originated.
The first forms of religion in our world are called by historians, “Primal Religions” because they are considered the most primitive and ancient forms of religion known. Primitive peoples like Aztecs and Incas and ancient African tribes that practiced primitive spiritualism are considered good examples of civilizations with underdeveloped, primal forms of religion. But at the heart of the rituals of these primal religions, often are religious practices and ideas shared in today’s popular modern religions, like Judaism, Christianity and Islam. For example, some of the rituals in primal religions include animal or human sacrifice and circumcision, ideas that are found directly in Bible and accepted today. Circumcision is still a religious obligation for Jews, as for human sacrifice Christians all over the world believe in the mortal sacrifice of God’s son, sent to die in flesh for the sins of humanity and Islam believes that the human sacrifice of a warrior in Jihad, even if he is a suicide bomber killing himself to harm others, will lead to a carnal paradise and eternal happiness.
The relations between modern religious practice and primal religious practice are very definitive and hard to overlook. Then if the popular religions today evolved out of the primal religions of primitive peoples, why do so many people believe these widespread religions that are a direct spawn of the primal religions, we would consider savage and inferior?
If we begin criticizing the most early and primitive forms of religion, we are undermining the foundation our world’s modern religions were built upon. We begin to realize how primitive modern popular religion itself is, not only relating it to the primal religious beliefs of our ancestors, but relating to today and now. The truth is, though human kind seems to have evolved at nearly light speed into the future, religion has stayed in its primitive state and has changed little for the best of us all.
Even though Religion has evolved from a primitive mankind and plagued with the devil’s influence, has often served a purpose of evil, it did not first originate from a source of evil, but rather, from God Himself.
As stated in the Messianic Gospel of Christ, everything in this cosmic Universe was created in the war between God and Satan. Their two powers colliding against each other made manifest everything that exists in our known Universe, including the Earth, mortal life and human kind’s belief systems. That means, religion was created in the war between God and the devil’s clashing influences and like everything else is imperfectly infested with the devil’s influence of evil.
The true purpose of religion is to give human beings a sense of God’s existence and not only his omniscient presence, but a sense of His divine authority and law amidst the duality of good and evil. God inspired through the philosophies of humanity, basic truths that exist shrouded in great elaborate legends. God inspired beliefs first of all in a supernatural authority of God or Gods, and belief in an afterlife of rewards or punishments, in exchange for the way human beings live their lives. God defined through religion the existence of a Lord, a Devil, a heaven, a hell, angels, demons, salvation, damnation, a Christ and an Antichrist as a few of many truths that do in fact exist. God used religion to create law and standards amongst human beings, and in many ages long ago, religion was the only law and order that existed amongst humanity.
Based on these truths, we can perhaps shine a light on Jesus’ purpose, by suggesting he was created to redefine the essence of Christ. Through the story of Jesus, God may have portrayed Christ as a powerful deity who is so close to God, he is nearly God himself. The difference between the Jewish definition of Messiah and the Christian definition of Messiah is obvious. The Christian Christ seems like a much more powerful and holy person and is the center of the religion, rather than a smaller part of the Jewish faith. Perhaps Jesus was simply meant to inspire the world to believe in the Messiah’s coming. Its possible all the hype was only to warn humanity of the millennial Christ and his coming/return to save the world.
In Conclusion
So in light of all this desolate darkness, as I gaze to the cross, trying to find the sliver of hope in the agonizing death of Jesus of Nazareth, I am turned away to reason and understanding, in denial of Jesus’ Messiahship. This is not the one to whom we must flock, for a Messiah is still to come, a Christ whom God promised would deliver our entire world and all who live, into the embrace of salvation. Why place hope in a Messiah that cannot stand up to the scrutiny of reason and the logic of the critical mind?
Don’t be dumbfounded by the rhetoric of the primitive Jesus. Instead, free your mind and open your heart to the full spectrum of Universal truth. This truth that remains clandestine amidst a maelstrom of superstition, is too often unseen by the ignorant eye, though the redolence of truth exists right under your nose. You just need to sense it for the first time, and as it awakens you, you will never return to the dream world of biblical folly again.
No longer, should humankind dwell in superstition, living in vain, pursuing the wrong essence in life. We should all now turn to the Messianic calling of God and fallow God’s will in fulfillment of the Messianic Destiny. We should stand for the salvation of Earth and for the deliverance of Christ unto this word, leaving behind the bonds that divide us from our Lord and from fulfilling our purpose.
As stated in the Messianic Gospel, “The Messiah has been sent by God to Earth to herald warning of Satan's plans to destroy our souls and to gospel that the Lord has come now through Christ so all can have salvation. God and Satan are at war and this entire dimension of the Universe has been created by their two powers colliding. Everything that has manifest has been planned between the influences of God and Satan, towards Armageddon and the final battle. The Earth was created amongst the stars to host the final battle and now in the midst of Armageddon our eternal fates are being decided. The Christ and the Antichrist are now upon the Earth in flesh and all our final purpose in God's plan can now be fulfilled. The Christ's life must be protected and the Antichrist must be destroyed to defeat Satan and if Christ is destroyed by sin in Armageddon, Satan will be victorious over all souls and none will have salvation. Now humanity has the choice to either submit to the commandments of God and have eternal salvation or submit to the reign of Satan on Earth and be damned eternally.
Mankind must unite to save the Earth, to protect the life of the Messiah and must destroy the Antichrist before Armageddon, when it is too late to triumph over Satan.”
So I urge you to respond to this article, with a total revolution in the way you live your life. Allow yourself to be powerfully convicted to take action towards God’s cause of saving our souls. Do not ignore your holy duty as a creation of the Lord. Serve God with all of your abilities and give everything that you can muster to the Messianic Kingdom of Heaven on Earth. Only by fallowing the Messianic way, will we be saved; there are no shortcuts through the scapegoat on the cross, Jesus of Nazareth.
As you awaken from your perceptions prison, as your paradigm radically shifts, you become a warrior of truth, a light amidst the darkness, waking up all those you can reach, to the Ultimate truth of the Universe; the Messianic truth of the Universe.
0 comments:
Post a Comment